What's new
By:

Would You Trade Hayward for Parsons?

Would you do this trade?

  • Yes

    Votes: 11 31.4%

  • No

    Votes: 23 65.7%

  • Yes but we would have to include Trey

    Votes: 1 2.9%
  • Total voters
    35
GP GS MIN FGM-A FG% 3PM-A 3P% FTM-A FT% OR DR REB AST BLK STL PF TO PTS
Parsons
Career 213 207 34.5 5.5-11.6 .473 1.6-4.3 .370 1.5-2.1 .705 1.1 4.1 5.2 3.3 0.4 1.1 2.2 1.7 14.1
Hayward
Career 287 179 28.3 4.1-9.4 .436 1.0-2.6 .365 2.8-3.5 .813 0.7 2.7 3.4 3.1 0.5 0.9 1.7 1.8 12.0

Parsons is slightly better at most things but it is close. I would rather just stick with the guy who has chemistry with the team.

Parsons has also played with better talent around him especially last year. I think if you trade parsons for hayward last year it makes no difference to either team.
 
Hantlers said:
Parsons is going to get paid just as much, if not more, than Hayward. I don't do the deal.
Click to expand...

They are similar talents and I think Parsons could play the 3 better than Hayward. I need to know what the plan is with Burks... we starting him? Is Hayward our new 3? Off the bench again?

Parsons seems to show more team leadership/personality. I think it'd be a lateral move, but might fit a need better. It's close which means it might be a viable deal.
 
Handlogten's Heros said:
I think Parsons could play the 3 better than Hayward.
Click to expand...

Yup, thats the dealbreaker for me.

even if they are equal talent and equal $$ I also lean towards Parsons, just to shake things up from a losing team last year.

Trey, Alec, Dante and Hood get the ball in their hands more because of this which i'd like to see. Someone will be forced to step up or we are in the lottery next year still with plenty of flexibility.

I dont mind that. (Imagine Exum steps up and is amazing next year :cool:)
 
PointGod_AlecBurks said:
Yup, thats the dealbreaker for me.

even if they are equal talent and equal $$ I also lean towards Parsons, just to shake things up from a losing team last year.

Trey, Alec, Dante and Hood get the ball in their hands more because of this which i'd like to see. Someone will be forced to step up or we are in the lottery next year still with plenty of flexibility.

I dont mind that. (Imagine Exum steps up and is amazing next year :cool:)
Click to expand...

We have to get these guys NBA reps... I think we stunted Favs and Kanter a bit. We don't want the young guys to get bad habits, but the need game time to get comfortable and develop. This would clear a little more PT for Exum, Burke, and Burks at the one and two.
 
Ya I like Hayward still. But I do think its a lateral move in terms of talent.

But in terms of it being a better fit......I like Parsons as he can play the 3 full time and even play a little 4 when we need to go small/quick.
 
Parsons has more of killer instinct and doesn't seem soft/scared like Hayward. Parsons stepped his game up in the playoffs, Hayward disappeared in his only playoff appearance (and in big games/moments in general). And the clincher for me...Parsons won't be expecting a $12M+/year contract, so we could get similar production to Hayward for a lot less.
 
akirac73 said:
Parsons has more of killer instinct and doesn't seem soft/scared like Hayward. Parsons stepped his game up in the playoffs, Hayward disappeared in his only playoff appearance (and in big games/moments in general). And the clincher for me...Parsons won't be expecting a $12M+/year contract, so we could get similar production to Hayward for a lot less.
Click to expand...

Disagree... dude is looking to get paid. He's make 2nd round money the last 3 years.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top