Gyp Rosetti
Banned
Yes. Anyone who says otherwise is a moran.
Too many of these:
as opposed pseudo-intellectual self-righteous doucher _________ (other belief)?
Who fits this claim? An open atheist who ran and lost because he was a douche?
Platforms are worthless professions crafted by committees and ignored by elected officials. It's all about the man. . . . or in some cases The Man. . . . or maybe even THE MAN.
But I think we have seen one case presently where even an atheist/progressive can do that, despite some public professions of being something else.
I'm intensely critical of Jon Huntsman despite his Mormon label because he just has too much pragmatism
I might cringe with embarrassment at most of the religious zealot conservatives, even Constitution Party and Libertarian Party, who are also incompetent ideologues unable to trace the fine lines of freedom woven into the fabric of our intentionally limited Constitutional government. Which was the only concept that could be successfully negotiated between thirteen or so wrangling freshly independent former "colonies" of the Imperial Crown. It was the fears of being freshly subjected and economically dominated by British cartelists that raised the horrors that only could induce them to have any central government at all.
Until I see someone intent up taking our federal government back into the original concept, including deconstructing the cartel-protecting international trade structures, I'm just gonna vote for third party dark horses, so I can look my kids in the eye and tell them I didn't vote for this government.
An atheist who is just as disbelieving in Government would get my vote.
One of the necessary corollaries to believing the Constitution will be preserved as a the model for Jesus' rule, which if it became the case would mean Jesus probably couldn't vote or hold office. . . . I'm getting a bit dizzy trying to integrate all these old Mormon notions into a coherent pattern.
From the ratification of the Constitution, some states still claimed the right as states to have "state religions" and viewed the Constitutional restriction against an "establishment of religion" just meant the Federal goverment was restricted, not the states. There were official "State Religions" clear into the mid nineteen hundred era, and even Brigham Young started out thinking his "State of Deseret" would have Mormonism as a state religion.
People came here just because of that, just like earlier migrations to our "colonies" under different religious colors were motivated by the need for a refuge where various religious folks could come.
sirkickyass said:This kid is somewhere between 14 and 16. He doesnt' actually mean anything but this is what impresses his idiot friends. Just ignore him.
This kid is somewhere between 18 and 35. He doesnt' actually mean anything but this is what impresses the (something or other) he is forced to settle for. Just ignore him.
You're not doing much to help your case about your age here.This kid is somewhere between 18 and 35. He doesnt' actually mean anything but this is what impresses the (some string of words) he is forced to settle for. Just ignore him.