addictionary
Well-Known Member
You have an apple in your hands and an apple hanging up in the tree. Which one fills your stomach?
Would you?
- Thread starter NUMBERICA
- Start date
Which team has a better chance at winning a title?
Burke
Burks
Wiggins
Kanter
Favors
or
Burke
Exum
Hayward
Kanter
Favors
Your question pretty much answers itself...
Burke
Burks
Wiggins
Kanter
Favors
or
Burke
Exum
Hayward
Kanter
Favors
Your question pretty much answers itself...
Exactly......
I was pro-Gordon and wasn't surprised that he went before Exum. Actually, I would still draft Gordon if both were available at 5 and I believe there are jazzfanzers that would to the same. So I'd trade only the 5th pick plus one of the Favors/Burks/Kanter/Hayward(he wasn't tradeable though) or whoever for Wiggins. But I wouldn't trade both 5th and 23rd picks and one of the main guys for JP and I stated that when that rumors were around.
Ive spent too long hyping Exum in my head. That said, if we got Wiggins, it would be pretty easy for me to do the same thing.
Indifferent.
Indifferent.
Thee Jazz Fan
Well-Known Member
Give me by far the best player in the draft, Wiggins.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The second group would have Burks off the bench. And it's assuming Wiggins is going to be much better than Exum. It could very well end up being the other way around. Tough call.
gregbroncs
Well-Known Member
I would have traded 5 and Hayward for Wiggins before the draft. I know it was not possible.
.
I'm not as sure about Exum. Really I don't know enough about him. I did not expect him to be there for the Jazz. To me it really would depend on how much Hayward will cost. If he can be had at 9-11 M I don't make this trade. If he will cost 12+ I probably do. Because at 12+ it basically is Exum for Wiggins for me, because I would not match Hayward at 12+ anyway.
.
I'm not as sure about Exum. Really I don't know enough about him. I did not expect him to be there for the Jazz. To me it really would depend on how much Hayward will cost. If he can be had at 9-11 M I don't make this trade. If he will cost 12+ I probably do. Because at 12+ it basically is Exum for Wiggins for me, because I would not match Hayward at 12+ anyway.
seattlejazzfan
Well-Known Member
Amen. Everybody saying they wouldn't do it - give it two or three days, a few Wiggins highlight videos, etc, they would be rubbing their eyes wondering if they are really awake after taking Cleveland to the woodshed like that.
(edit) I should make it clear, this is not a criticism at all - rather it's just fans doing what fans do.
![[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]](/data/avatars/m/2/2497.jpg?1511131091){kind=avatar}
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]
Well-Known Member
I'm probably stoned on Exum right now. I see a guaranteed mismatch at the PG. I've been dreaming of Exum and Burks slashing the hell out of defenses.
Exum has impressed me in interviews.
Oof. Definitely torn. But I like what ^gregbroncs^ said, too.
Exum has impressed me in interviews.
Oof. Definitely torn. But I like what ^gregbroncs^ said, too.
QuinSnydersHair
Well-Known Member
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];864186 said:
Me too. If we see the kid is legit, I would love Dennis to parlay Burke, Kanter and picks too if necessary into something big. The Bucks 2016 unprotected 1st rounder or something like that. Don't get me wrong. I still have hope for Burke and Kanter but their defensive inabilities, if not improved this year, make them expendable to me.