What's new

Wouldn't that Enes trade be great?

Actually, Oklahoma is the perfect fit for Kanter and Kanter is the perfect fit for Oklahoma. Put Kanter in and take Kendrick out. Try stopping these guys score.
 
Kanter does fit OKC. u r dum

U r dumb

How can you say out one side of your mouth that Kanter sucks. He can't pass, he can't shoot, he can't play defense. But oh man, put him on OKC what a monster he is gonna be. Push Adams and Ibaka aside folks, here comes Kanter.

Give me a break. You and every person who likes your post are a bunch of brain dead retards.

I'm sure Westbrook and Durant are just gonna love his no defense ball stopping style of play.

Good one. You officially have hit rock bottom
 
U r dumb

How can you say out one side of your mouth that Kanter sucks. He can't pass, he can't shoot, he can't play defense. But oh man, put him on OKC what a monster he is gonna be. Push Adams and Ibaka aside folks, here comes Kanter.

Give me a break. You and every person who likes your post are a bunch of brain dead retards.

I'm sure Westbrook and Durant are just gonna love his no defense ball stopping style of play.

Good one. You officially have hit rock bottom

Never said he would be a monster. I think he would be a good fit. I think he is better than every big other than Ibaka on their team. I think he is an upgrade and is a good fit.
 
I thought about the movement liability of his game too before I wrote that but he cannot survive anywhere if he doesn't figure it out decently so no worries there. Russell would kick his ***.
 
Never said he would be a monster. I think he would be a good fit. I think he is better than every big other than Ibaka on their team. I think he is an upgrade and is a good fit.


Your logic has holes all over in it. Just because these braindead fools don't have the brain capacity to see through it, doesn't mean I dont.


One minute you are saying Kanter is the worse passer ever, he can't shoot, and he can't play defense. Those are your words. If he can't do any of those things, how is he better than Steven Adams? And how is he a good fit on OKC. What use does OKC have for him? Kanter's only discernible skill is scoring, even by your own admission, except you won't even give him the credit of being able to shoot.

Do you think OKC needs more scoring? Do they really need another guy to score? Seems to me that they have plenty of scoring coming from Westbrook and Durant. Even if they did need more scoring, what good is a guy to them that is the worst passer ever and can't play defense?

Good hell man, you are acting like a bad politician right now. You are saying whatever you think you need to, to sound right. Except it's not working. You are waffling all over the place.

Get it together. The whole thing has to make sense, not just one thing at a time when you think it's a good idea.

OKC has Adams on the cheap. He is a better defensive presence down low than Kanter. He is a lot cheaper than Kanter will be. That is really important when building a team. Stop over looking these details. Stop waffling. Makes some damn sense and have some consistency in what you say. They aren't targeting Kanter, so you'll never get the chance to be proven right. It's not happening because it doesn't make sense.
 
Your logic has holes all over in it. Just because these braindead fools don't have the brain capacity to see through it, doesn't mean I dont.


One minute you are saying Kanter is the worse passer ever, he can't shoot, and he can't play defense. Those are your words. If he can't do any of those things, how is he better than Steven Adams? And how is he a good fit on OKC. What use does OKC have for him? Kanter's only discernible skill is scoring, even by your own admission, except you won't even give him the credit of being able to shoot.

Do you think OKC needs more scoring? Do they really need another guy to score? Seems to me that they have plenty of scoring coming from Westbrook and Durant. Even if they did need more scoring, what good is a guy to them that is the worst passer ever and can't play defense?

Good hell man, you are acting like a bad politician right now. You are saying whatever you think you need to, to sound right. Except it's not working. You are waffling all over the place.

Get it together. The whole thing has to make sense, not just one thing at a time when you think it's a good idea.

OKC has Adams on the cheap. He is a better defensive presence down low than Kanter. He is a lot cheaper than Kanter will be. That is really important when building a team. Stop over looking these details. Stop waffling. Makes some damn sense and have some consistency in what you say. They aren't targeting Kanter, so you'll never get the chance to be proven right. It's not happening because it doesn't make sense.
Easy man. Kanter in OKC was a good idea all along with Ibaka playing near him. Kinda like the Rudy effect to his gaps.
 
Easy man. Kanter in OKC was a good idea all along with Ibaka playing near him. Kinda like the Rudy effect to his gaps.

Even if he were, and he isnt, Cy is the last person who should be selling Kanter a good fit anywhere. Kanter's been his whipping boy all season long.

He calls me dumb, I'm showing him why he's really the dumb one.
 
Even if he were, and he isnt, Cy is the last person who should be selling Kanter a good fit anywhere. Kanter's been his whipping boy all season long.

He calls me dumb, I'm showing him why he's really the dumb one.

Alrighty. I'll leave you two cutiepies alone then.

Don't go too hard on him.
 
Actually, the Jazz are NOT disappointed with Kanter's development. Maybe a little slower than it should be. But the old school of thought was that it took bigs 5 years to develop - and that was back in the days when they actually had multiple years of college. Listen to Lindsey's interview. He said the Jazz believe in Kanter as a person and player and like his work ethic. They like him as a young player. Utah is going to stroke his ego and have him back playing hard. Over the last month, I've seen a lot of good signs by Enes, Hos agent keeps going back to a couple of wasted seasons, but is happy with the current coaching staff. Things will be patched up.

I agree with your comments but the reality is that the Jazz have 3 starting bigs who are young and want to play and start. Someone isn't going to be happy. The Jazz will have a tough decision to make so I think they need to make the hard decision now and get someone for one of the bigs. I like all three guys. Each guy has their own strengths and weaknesses but I think Kanter is the guy who has to go simply because if you sign him to a big contract then you have to start him. This will eventually make Gobert unhappy.
 
Do you think OKC needs more scoring? Do they really need another guy to score? Seems to me that they have plenty of scoring coming from Westbrook and Durant. Even if they did need more scoring, what good is a guy to them that is the worst passer ever and can't play defense?

Actually, having watched OKC at least 5 games this season, scoring is EXACTLY what they could use right now. Durant is limping through the season and teams are gaining up on Westbrook. He can't do it all. Serge has never been a back to the basket scorer. He is a drive and pop release valve when Durant and Westbrook can't do it all. I don't think it's a terrible trade for OKC if they want to get into the playoffs. Perkins gives them nothing. Kanter makes them more potent offensively and gives them some toughness. Lamb is a nice piece (not steller). Kanter helps get them into the playoffs and is off. Perkins cashes the Jazz up. OKC is probably giving up too much for a playoff rental but Kanter could buy them time while Durant heals up for a playoff push.

Probably depends on how bad they want to make the playoffs.
 
Actually, having watched OKC at least 5 games this season, scoring is EXACTLY what they could use right now. Durant is limping through the season and teams are gaining up on Westbrook. He can't do it all. Serge has never been a back to the basket scorer. He is a drive and pop release valve when Durant and Westbrook can't do it all. I don't think it's a terrible trade for OKC if they want to get into the playoffs. Perkins gives them nothing. Kanter makes them more potent offensively and gives them some toughness. Lamb is a nice piece (not steller). Kanter helps get them into the playoffs and is off. Perkins cashes the Jazz up. OKC is probably giving up too much for a playoff rental but Kanter could buy them time while Durant heals up for a playoff push.

Probably depends on how bad they want to make the playoffs.

Pretty badly. The FO has to show they have what it takes to make moves to make the team better to build up KD's confidence in the team, making OKC more attractive to re-sign. They don't even have to give up that much in assets to get Kanter. It's basically their mid-late 1st rounder (will probably be early 20's) for Kanter. They don't use Lamb now that they have Waiters and Kanter is an upgrade to Perkins.
 
Pretty badly. The FO has to show they have what it takes to make moves to make the team better to build up KD's confidence in the team, making OKC more attractive to re-sign. They don't even have to give up that much in assets to get Kanter. It's basically their mid-late 1st rounder (will probably be early 20's) for Kanter. They don't use Lamb now that they have Waiters and Kanter is an upgrade to Perkins.

Agreed. I think it is one of the more reasonable trades that has been suggested. I doubt that they toss in Perry Jones too though. Kanter + asset (2nd rounder, Novak, steamy picture of KOC's wife or something) for Perkins and Lamb at the core makes good sense for both groups in my humble opinion. Jazz get back to a great spot financially and they get a quality 3 to add to the mix of youth. Perkins brings some fight to the table, but probably doesn't stick around for next year.
 
Back
Top