What's new

WOW!!!! Upcoming Cover of Newsweek!

The magazine covers look to be harsh on Clinton when he was impeached, and nice to Bush after 9-11. Is that supposed to prove some kind of point.
 
Empirical testing my ***. More like comical frauds (like gluing moths to trees) in the case of Darwinism, and fraudulent numbers in the case of global warming.

Just out of curiousity, is this deliberate ignorance? I mean, I know your opinion won't change, but do you really care nothing for facts?

Moths have been glued to trees for gtextbooks pictures, not in the course of science. Climate scientists have not produced fraudulant numbers, and in fact numerous governmental investigations have cleared some accused scientists.
 
Just out of curiousity, is this deliberate ignorance? I mean, I know your opinion won't change, but do you really care nothing for facts?

Moths have been glued to trees for gtextbooks pictures, not in the course of science. Climate scientists have not produced fraudulant numbers, and in fact numerous governmental investigations have cleared some accused scientists.

I wish I was as level headed as you are. Nothing angers me as much as people like PearlWatson and TheSilencer whose entire thought process seems to be based on memorizing enough soundbites to justify what they want to be true. You just casually refute their nonsense with logic and evidence, although you know that it will make no difference. :(
 
I wish I was as level headed as you are. Nothing angers me as much as people like PearlWatson and TheSilencer whose entire thought process seems to be based on memorizing enough soundbites to justify what they want to be true. You just casually refute their nonsense with logic and evidence, although you know that it will make no difference. :(

I'm sure some people will be glad to confirm I'm less level-headed on issues of racism, homophobia, vaccine safety, etc. (at least one person has me on their ignore list because of this).
 
I'm sure some people will be glad to confirm I'm less level-headed on issues of racism, homophobia, vaccine safety, etc. (at least one person has me on their ignore list because of this).

That's probably because they disagree with you. I've always found your arguments to be fairly objective and backed by the best available evidence.

I have no problem with disagreements. I don't think I've ever agreed with anything Scat said. But I never had a problem with him. However, some people think ignorance is a perfectly acceptable substitute for evidence. They even seem to pride themselves in not providing any objectivity. It is as if they think the farther you are from accepted methods of acquiring knowledge and evaluating evidence the better.

And you engage with them so calmly! I, on the other hand, get more and more heated. I can't help it. It's quite sad. :p
 
Thank goodness we have the Slopper's and Thriller's of the world. Without them, politics would be so blah. Also, please stop giving credence to anything The Silencer says -- he's a very elaborate troll, is likely out of work, and has nothing but time on his hands to stir the pot. There is no possible way that anyone is that dumb. (except craig1221, but he was 1 in a million)
 
I wish I was as level headed as you are. Nothing angers me as much as people like PearlWatson and TheSilencer whose entire thought process seems to be based on memorizing enough soundbites to justify what they want to be true. You just casually refute their nonsense with logic and evidence, although you know that it will make no difference. :(

Such an agree man SiroMar.
Just for the record..... you're the one that always starts fights with everyone, and gets mad at anyone that might have a different outlook other than your casual mainstream attitude.

You do notice that PearlWatson and myself don't really care much about you getting mad or not.
Try some prescription drugs or something.
 
Thank goodness we have the Slopper's and Thriller's of the world. Without them, politics would be so blah. Also, please stop giving credence to anything The Silencer says -- he's a very elaborate troll, is likely out of work, and has nothing but time on his hands to stir the pot. There is no possible way that anyone is that dumb. (except craig1221, but he was 1 in a million)

Give me a break Trout.
You've seen my facebook profile, and you know exactly what I do for a living.
I'm just a normal lower-middle class dude, that puts his opinions out there sometimes.
Just because I don't believe the mainstream media's lying junk that they put out, doesn't mean you have to call people dumb.

I guess better got into insurince industrey ore else I I'll neverr eble to bee smert
 
That's probably because they disagree with you. I've always found your arguments to be fairly objective and backed by the best available evidence.

I have no problem with disagreements. I don't think I've ever agreed with anything Scat said. But I never had a problem with him. However, some people think ignorance is a perfectly acceptable substitute for evidence. They even seem to pride themselves in not providing any objectivity. It is as if they think the farther you are from accepted methods of acquiring knowledge and evaluating evidence the better.

And you engage with them so calmly! I, on the other hand, get more and more heated. I can't help it. It's quite sad. :p

I'm fine with disagreements. I liek hearing opposing views if given with respect.

If I feel you just try to grand stand and throw out stupd, baseless accusations at peopel then I no longer feel your are no longer worth my full time.
 
Such an agree man SiroMar.
Just for the record..... you're the one that always starts fights with everyone, and gets mad at anyone that might have a different outlook other than your casual mainstream attitude.

You do notice that PearlWatson and myself don't really care much about you getting mad or not.
Try some prescription drugs or something.

First, I never said I wanted you to care if I got mad. I am just annoyed that I can't help getting heated when I'm debating someone who is so obviously beneath me. And you are beneath me. In almost any criteria you choose. Second, you don't have an outlook. You're just a know-nothing ignoramus whose confidence stems directly from lack of knowledge. I'm just saddened that some uncontrollable impulse prevents me from simply ignoring you.
 
Moths have been glued to trees for gtextbooks pictures, not in the course of science. Climate scientists have not produced fraudulant numbers, and in fact numerous governmental investigations have cleared some accused scientists.

Just out of curiosity, is this deliberate ignorance?
 
First, I never said I wanted you to care if I got mad. I am just annoyed that I can't help getting heated when I'm debating someone who is so obviously beneath me. And you are beneath me. In almost any criteria you choose. Second, you don't have an outlook. You're just a know-nothing ignoramus whose confidence stems directly from lack of knowledge. I'm just saddened that some uncontrollable impulse prevents me from simply ignoring you.

Yes we knew this already.
Everyone is beneath SiroMar, and his "****" most certainly does not stink.
So.... in conclusion, just get on your high horse on and press the ignore button please.
This will save you from such MADDENING debates, and might most likely prevent you from a possible stroke.
Second, is that the same uncontollable impulse that prevents you from not being an egotistical bonehead??
 
Yes we knew this already.
Everyone is beneath SiroMar, and his "****" most certainly does not stink.
So.... in conclusion, just get on your high horse on and press the ignore button please.
This will save you from such MADDENING debates, and might most likely prevent you from a possible stroke.
Second, is that the same uncontollable impulse that prevents you from not being an egotistical bonehead??

No, not everyone is beneath me. Only you and 3 or 4 others.
 
Come on man, give us names. Am I on that list?

No. Have you ever "refuted" a number of thoughtful posts with a bunch of quotes from a pop sci-fi book and a series of "you can't be serious"? Have you responded to 20+ links to research with a photoshopped image mocking vaccinations? Then no.
 
Back
Top