This is old news, Everybody knows Hunter has been buying up US corporate interests to bolster Xi's delusions of world dominance. Everybody knows Bill gave the Chinese top notch technology to send China into Space domination, and nuclear targeting excellence. Everyone knows China has cut deals with almost every US corporation transfering technological excellence to Chinese industries of all kinds. Everyone knows Xi''s Belt and Road projects insinuate China into political relevance all around the world.
But Trump and his rogue diplomacy imbeciles have been saying stuff like that, as it's "True".
Apparently, this has made US Establishment icons like The Council on Foreign Relations, mad. Mad enough to even deny the obvious.
According to Babe's World views, the geopolitical landscape is still based on British Imperialism. I mean, all those colonies...... nobody ever gets free of the British commercial schemers and British intelligence psy-op projects. And the CFR is just of of many such retailers of modern Imperialism. I mean, really, you can't just let people run their own damn governments.
The Chinese are, today, taking Hong Kong into regular outright mainland management. The Chinese are, today, building personnel landing craft at breakneck speed, by the thousands. There are, after all, almost 100 million excess males in Mainland China, and it would cost more to just bury them there than to send them over the straight to Formosa...... China's claims, whether communist or nationalist, to Formosa have no historical basis except, well, the Nationalist Army relocated there. And now the Chicom army is getting ready to land there, too.
So, if you read the Progressive(?????)/ Feudalist "Foreign Affairs" magazine, you can almost taste the arrogance, as it tries to salvage "Peace in Our Time" and sell us out just ahead of The Xi Dynasty.
Our grand delusionist politicians du jour have believed the lie that the world will be a better place if the US is, as some philosophers have argued, displaced as the world's foremost aggressor. And China has received the nod as the next world power du jour.
David Rockefeller has written dreamily of the better world he has worked for, and declared the "Mao did a good job" in China. And, like the Times did in the 1930s, our Press is covering up for Xi just like they did for Stalin.
I just don't see a whole lot of difference between totalitarian governments.
www.foreignaffairs.com
I saw the Rockefellers go wrong with Marcos in the Philippines, and a lot of other places, like Syria in the 1980s. I don't know why we go on thinking we're in good hands with these folks.
But Trump and his rogue diplomacy imbeciles have been saying stuff like that, as it's "True".
Apparently, this has made US Establishment icons like The Council on Foreign Relations, mad. Mad enough to even deny the obvious.
According to Babe's World views, the geopolitical landscape is still based on British Imperialism. I mean, all those colonies...... nobody ever gets free of the British commercial schemers and British intelligence psy-op projects. And the CFR is just of of many such retailers of modern Imperialism. I mean, really, you can't just let people run their own damn governments.
The Chinese are, today, taking Hong Kong into regular outright mainland management. The Chinese are, today, building personnel landing craft at breakneck speed, by the thousands. There are, after all, almost 100 million excess males in Mainland China, and it would cost more to just bury them there than to send them over the straight to Formosa...... China's claims, whether communist or nationalist, to Formosa have no historical basis except, well, the Nationalist Army relocated there. And now the Chicom army is getting ready to land there, too.
So, if you read the Progressive(?????)/ Feudalist "Foreign Affairs" magazine, you can almost taste the arrogance, as it tries to salvage "Peace in Our Time" and sell us out just ahead of The Xi Dynasty.
Our grand delusionist politicians du jour have believed the lie that the world will be a better place if the US is, as some philosophers have argued, displaced as the world's foremost aggressor. And China has received the nod as the next world power du jour.
David Rockefeller has written dreamily of the better world he has worked for, and declared the "Mao did a good job" in China. And, like the Times did in the 1930s, our Press is covering up for Xi just like they did for Stalin.
I just don't see a whole lot of difference between totalitarian governments.
Xi Jinping Is Not Stalin
Trump officials’ false historical analogies are undermining their efforts to effectively contain China.
I saw the Rockefellers go wrong with Marcos in the Philippines, and a lot of other places, like Syria in the 1980s. I don't know why we go on thinking we're in good hands with these folks.
Last edited: