What's new

You like this starting lineup?

Like it?

  • Yay

    Votes: 4 18.2%
  • Nay

    Votes: 18 81.8%

  • Total voters
    22
Did you guys not read the 3 years part? If you don't think any of those guys offense will be vastly improved than of course that lineup will be horrible offensively.

But I have more faith in our young guys. And Aaron Gordon has the skills to improve as well. He's only 18.

We did take the 3 year part into consideration. But considering how slowly Favors have come offensively 3-4 years ago, forgive me for not having such high expectations out of Aaron or Gobert.
 
A. Gordon necessitates Kanter being out there and able to draw a big to the perimeter when needed.

Burke
Hayward
Gordon
Favors
Kanter

I would really like a future (when Lavine develops) lineup of:

Lavine - freak athlete, dead eye shooter, elite length for position.
Hayward - great lsize for position. Good defense. Slasher/driver/athletic playmaker. Ball handler. Rebounder.
Gordon - Great size, length, D, instincts, ball handling, rebounding, playmaking, finishing, shot blocker. Etc.
Favors - great D, size for PF, athletic, shot blocker. Rubs well for big. Rebounder. Improving passing.
Kanter - good size. Born to rebound. Easy putbacks. Can draw big to perimeter. Improving D. Improving passing. Runs well for big man.

^ that lineup, when developed (gamble on Lavine), would have good to elite size at every oosition. Insane athleticism, 3pt shooting, slashing w/o the ball, well above average rebounding at every position, uptempo runners who could make opponents pay dearly in our altitude, above average ball handling for positions 1-3, a decent amount of passing, and a good balance of defense and offense.

But it would require us trading up to snag Lavine, since he's out of our range now. Would trade #23, #35, rights to Tomic, GSW's second rounder next year, and possibly more depending on how his workouts go to get is into late lottery, or just out of it, to grab him.
 
A. Gordon necessitates Kanter being out there and able to draw a big to the perimeter when needed.

Burke
Hayward
Gordon
Favors
Kanter

I would really like a future (when Lavine develops) lineup of:

Lavine - freak athlete, dead eye shooter, elite length for position.
Hayward - great lsize for position. Good defense. Slasher/driver/athletic playmaker. Ball handler. Rebounder.
Gordon - Great size, length, D, instincts, ball handling, rebounding, playmaking, finishing, shot blocker. Etc.
Favors - great D, size for PF, athletic, shot blocker. Rubs well for big. Rebounder. Improving passing.
Kanter - good size. Born to rebound. Easy putbacks. Can draw big to perimeter. Improving D. Improving passing. Runs well for big man.

^ that lineup, when developed (gamble on Lavine), would have good to elite size at every oosition. Insane athleticism, 3pt shooting, slashing w/o the ball, well above average rebounding at every position, uptempo runners who could make opponents pay dearly in our altitude, above average ball handling for positions 1-3, a decent amount of passing, and a good balance of defense and offense.

But it would require us trading up to snag Lavine, since he's out of our range now. Would trade #23, #35, rights to Tomic, GSW's second rounder next year, and possibly more depending on how his workouts go to get is into late lottery, or just out of it, to grab him.

I like that line up much better.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Trashtalk
 
Back
Top