You like this starting lineup?
- Thread starter Beantown
- Start date
Twin Towers
Well-Known Member
Worst shooting and offensive team in the league. Aaron Gordon is a PF until he figured out his shot. I don't even think he has the lateral quickness to play SF either. He is PF but not even full time. The guy is overrated.
I prefer
Trey
Burks
Parker
Kanter
Favors
Don't trade anyone away. Trade away draft picks to get Parker.
![[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]](/data/avatars/m/2/2497.jpg?1511131091){kind=avatar}
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size]
Well-Known Member
dude, I've been hyping McDaniels for months. You aren't agreeing with dippp****tt.
[size/HUGE] fixed [/size];832843 said:
It's a pity nobody really pays any attention to you then.
.... actually it's not. It's really AWESOME.
Beantown
Well-Known Member
Did you guys not read the 3 years part? If you don't think any of those guys offense will be vastly improved than of course that lineup will be horrible offensively.
But I have more faith in our young guys. And Aaron Gordon has the skills to improve as well. He's only 18.
But I have more faith in our young guys. And Aaron Gordon has the skills to improve as well. He's only 18.
We did take the 3 year part into consideration. But considering how slowly Favors have come offensively 3-4 years ago, forgive me for not having such high expectations out of Aaron or Gobert.
Sexual Favors
Well-Known Member
A. Gordon necessitates Kanter being out there and able to draw a big to the perimeter when needed.
Burke
Hayward
Gordon
Favors
Kanter
I would really like a future (when Lavine develops) lineup of:
Lavine - freak athlete, dead eye shooter, elite length for position.
Hayward - great lsize for position. Good defense. Slasher/driver/athletic playmaker. Ball handler. Rebounder.
Gordon - Great size, length, D, instincts, ball handling, rebounding, playmaking, finishing, shot blocker. Etc.
Favors - great D, size for PF, athletic, shot blocker. Rubs well for big. Rebounder. Improving passing.
Kanter - good size. Born to rebound. Easy putbacks. Can draw big to perimeter. Improving D. Improving passing. Runs well for big man.
^ that lineup, when developed (gamble on Lavine), would have good to elite size at every oosition. Insane athleticism, 3pt shooting, slashing w/o the ball, well above average rebounding at every position, uptempo runners who could make opponents pay dearly in our altitude, above average ball handling for positions 1-3, a decent amount of passing, and a good balance of defense and offense.
But it would require us trading up to snag Lavine, since he's out of our range now. Would trade #23, #35, rights to Tomic, GSW's second rounder next year, and possibly more depending on how his workouts go to get is into late lottery, or just out of it, to grab him.
Burke
Hayward
Gordon
Favors
Kanter
I would really like a future (when Lavine develops) lineup of:
Lavine - freak athlete, dead eye shooter, elite length for position.
Hayward - great lsize for position. Good defense. Slasher/driver/athletic playmaker. Ball handler. Rebounder.
Gordon - Great size, length, D, instincts, ball handling, rebounding, playmaking, finishing, shot blocker. Etc.
Favors - great D, size for PF, athletic, shot blocker. Rubs well for big. Rebounder. Improving passing.
Kanter - good size. Born to rebound. Easy putbacks. Can draw big to perimeter. Improving D. Improving passing. Runs well for big man.
^ that lineup, when developed (gamble on Lavine), would have good to elite size at every oosition. Insane athleticism, 3pt shooting, slashing w/o the ball, well above average rebounding at every position, uptempo runners who could make opponents pay dearly in our altitude, above average ball handling for positions 1-3, a decent amount of passing, and a good balance of defense and offense.
But it would require us trading up to snag Lavine, since he's out of our range now. Would trade #23, #35, rights to Tomic, GSW's second rounder next year, and possibly more depending on how his workouts go to get is into late lottery, or just out of it, to grab him.
