You trying to beat homeytennis for most interesting thread?
What's your opinion on Zach Lavine?
A more athletic Crawford with worse handles and IQ.
He is still only 20. Do you think he'll get significantly better and be Allstar caliber?
A more athletic Crawford with worse handles and IQ.
Does Zach Lavine have an IQ above 100?
I think he's a more athletic Alec Burks with better handles and similar IQ... FWIW.
Dude, Alec has always been an excellent rebounder for his position. It's what separates him from others. Zach Lavine was the worst rebounder in the NCAAs, and shows a lot of hesitancy to mix it up, in general. If he can do the one or two things he's good at, then fine, but if he's out of his comfort zone, he's a wuss. Nobody ever said that about Alec Burks.
Lavine can jump, so he's overrated.
You've been very outspoken about how LaVine won't be very good. Could you expand on that more for me and other people reading this?
What's this idea that jumping makes you overrated? Would you have said the same thing about Michael Jordan early in his career?
Why does being able to jump high make a player worse in your opinion?
What's the highest you have ever jumped?
Did you get made fun of when you would try to touch the rim and would only get net?