What's new
By:

Zero Dark Thirty

I'm looking forward to seeing this movie, and might be catching a free advance screening tomorrow. It depends on if I want to drive downtown in the snow storm.

I'm also excited that one of my favorite bands (Ours) recorded a new version of the following song for the movie. It's supposed to play at some point during the movie.

[video=youtube_share;ZRV7VLSGVbM]https://youtu.be/ZRV7VLSGVbM
 
Gyp Rosetti said:
Many, many gov't people, including CIA'ers (and senators I believe) who collaborated on the movie are saying some (much?) of the movie is FOS. Don't get me wrong, I'm going to see it. And sadly, I probably find KB more trustworthy than I do some CIA morons given our government's integrity barometer in most of our eyes. I sort of wonder where the truth lies though. And no matter, based on the trailers, I am dying to see it and will.
Click to expand...

There was a good bit in the news recently how the movie implied we got the critical intel on bin Laden via torture (so I'm told, I haven't seen it yet but plan to). Some high placed sources have said this is not true but that the critical intel was obtained through other means. As someone who is opposed to torture on both practical and moral grounds (and yes, water boarding IS torture), if this is true, I am very disappointed that Bigelow (Director) chose to depict it this way. Still, Hurt Locker was a great movie (also directed by Bigelow), so I have high hopes for this one, inaccuracies aside.

As a general rule also, you can be very certain that any Hollywood depiction of a historical event takes artistic liberties with history. Recent case in point, Argo, which although a great movie, played fast and loose with some actual historical details of the rescue (one example, there was no drama in the airport as depicted in the movie, they simply boarded the plane and left).
 
It seemed kind of underwhelming...I really had no clue what happened going into the movie, I never read too much about the whole story, but to me it felt like there was so much more to it that wasn't explained in the movie. Some of my favorite TV actors were in it though (Walts dad from Lost, Andy from Parks and Rec, Pete from The League, Coach Taylor from FNL). Overall, I thought it was a pretty good movie...much better than Argo.
 
jimmy eat jazz said:
There was a good bit in the news recently how the movie implied we got the critical intel on bin Laden via torture (so I'm told, I haven't seen it yet but plan to). Some high placed sources have said this is not true but that the critical intel was obtained through other means. As someone who is opposed to torture on both practical and moral grounds (and yes, water boarding IS torture), if this is true, I am very disappointed that Bigelow (Director) chose to depict it this way. Still, Hurt Locker was a great movie (also directed by Bigelow), so I have high hopes for this one, inaccuracies aside.
Click to expand...

Yes, this is what has transpired. However, I'm not so quick to point fingers at Bigelow. I don't trust our G-men as far as I can throw them and I think the far majority of us are pretty confident in saying waterboarding has taken place. The only real question then is, did it take place to obtain intel in these particular instances? I don't know the answer to that. But imo, I find the CIA's desire to deny much more transparent (deny, deny, deny, protect their reputation) than Bigelow's desire to Hollywood-ize the movie.
 
bros i need some quick advice. tonight. should i see this or django.
im thinkin django and gonna see it anyway but if this is really good i can wait for django.
 
The Hurt Locker was boring as ****. I'm bias though because I find most War/Military movies to be boring as ****.
 
If you don't want to see torture for intel, I suggest you stay away from this movie. It didn't bother me. The movie to me was more about the development of the CIA agent, "Maya." You see how she changes during the film and this actress does a great job in the film.

I know the CIA and gov't said it didn't happen the way it was depicted but the ending was exactly how the DEVGRU member explained in, "No Easy Day." I loved that book so it was cool to see how true they stayed to what he depicted.

The DEVGRU member said Osama never even picked up his gun and it didn't come off the wall where it was hung even though he knew they were coming for him. The SEAL's words about that to his teammate were, "This guy is a ****ing *****. He tells everyone to fight to the death and he didn't even pick up his gun."

If you're looking for some high intensity war scenes, this isn't the movie for you. Like I said, it's all about how the main character develops throughout the film and the last scene is ****ing amazing.
 
I liked it, but I didnt love it. It kind of drug on for me, almost 3 hours long. I kept hearing how intense the last 40 minutes were but I thought it was pretty anti climactic. It may be true to what happened but maybe they should have embellished it a bit for entertainments sake.
 
SHAKY CAM SUCKS.

after years and millions of dollars spending to perfect a stable camera.
retards get epileptic cameramen to shake cameras.


booo shaky cams sucks(Public service anouncement this aint a threat to people who love shaky cam and use it)


want proof why shaky cam sucks?
because it has not been used in porn YET
 
DutchJazzer said:
SHAKY CAM SUCKS.

after years and millions of dollars spending to perfect a stable camera.
retards get epileptic cameramen to shake cameras.


booo shaky cams sucks(Public service anouncement this aint a threat to people who love shaky cam and use it)


want proof why shaky cam sucks?
because it has not been used in porn YET
Click to expand...

Guess you've never watched, "POV" porn scenes huh? You live a shallow life if you haven't seen that yet. ; )
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top