What's new

Monday Spurs VS Jazz 7 PM ET ---- Front row seat!

If the Spurs had hit their numerous wide open shots, it could have been an entirely different game. It was an overall good defensive game for the Jazz, but it's too early to say that our defense is bulletproof.

They were completely out of sync. Take a wild guess as to why.
 
I miss him a little.
I always thought he was fun and made me laugh. And I felt he was pretty good at basketball for a 22 year old.

Don't miss him alot though

I miss Kanter the character-- not Kanter the basketball player. Like, at all. It turned me on seeing Gobert out there.
 
If the Spurs had hit their numerous wide open shots, it could have been an entirely different game. It was an overall good defensive game for the Jazz, but it's too early to say that our defense is bulletproof.

So you are saying either you did not watch the game or you are a hater.
 
I love how so many whiners here complain about "oh you can't compliment Kanter without trashing the jazz" and now multiple people are posting/liking posts about how the Jazz are so good now that Kanter is gone. Hypocritical. Not all of you, just some.

This is a UTAH JAZZ board, not an Enes Kanter board.

I am so sad that I had to point that out.
 
If the Spurs had hit their numerous wide open shots, it could have been an entirely different game. It was an overall good defensive game for the Jazz, but it's too early to say that our defense is bulletproof.
They were rushed shots with guys coming out at them most of the time. Not the same as open. Besides they were taken out of their rhythm early and that contributed to missed shot. The Jazz missed far more "open" shots than the Spurs did. This would have been a complete blowout if both teams hit their open shots.
 
If the Spurs had hit their numerous wide open shots, it could have been an entirely different game. It was an overall good defensive game for the Jazz, but it's too early to say that our defense is bulletproof.
Maybe so..... still I would rather pay big bucks to an elite offensive player to help Hayward with the playmaking duties than a poor offensive player that plays great defense.

I feel that we will be good defensively as long as we have rudy, favors, and exum (plus Hayward is a good defender) no matter who else we have at the wing.

I think we need help on the offensive end though
 
seriously dude, lighten the f#$% up ... "mexicans" purely means someone south of where you are, wherever that may be

Oh, so your statement was "they're a feral bunch of people south of where you are on that forum"? Or is there a special hick meaning to every word you speak?

There doesn't seem to be an end to the idiots one has to deal with on daily basis.
 
seriously dude, lighten the f#$% up ... "mexicans" purely means someone south of where you are, wherever that may be

It's offensive, period. Irrespective of what meaning you give to it; it's offensive. Siro was mindful enough to say something and I should have when I read it. Rather than getting upset, try to understand why you might have offended someone and why it is wrong. Unless you don't care about racism. Either you agree with people attaching negative connotations to people based of of their race or nationality, or you don't. It's that simple.
 
Oh, so your statement was "they're a feral bunch of people south of where you are on that forum"? Or is there a special hick meaning to every word you speak?

There doesn't seem to be an end to the idiots one has to deal with on daily basis.
Are you legit upset at the dudes comment or just trolling him?
 
So we just blew out two western conference elites and the board immediately degenerates into arguments and 8th grade jokes. Classic Jazzfanz.
 
Top