Dumb pig cops getting smarter?

[NAOS]

I'm a slave to the truth.

welcome back to jfc.

 

[Deleted member 848]

GVC throwin' haymakers. dayum.

 

[Stoked]

fixed

on a serious note:
yet you fail to see the same (dis)quality in HH post. because he started this. not me!
but ooh wait he is on your side of the argument so it is ok.

see below for examples




i am sure there are more. but dont wanna poison myu mind searching for em.

so he is on your side but its ok

Actually HH gets hit a lot for his rhetoric. Nice try though.

 

[GVC]

GVC throwin' haymakers. dayum.

Jimmy Eat Jazz is one of the most thoughtful and respectful posters on JF. His statements and questions were reasonable. NAOS seems to only be interested in self-affirmation, even if it involves insulting decent people (like JEJ). Unacceptable.

 

[DutchJazzer]

Actually HH gets hit a lot for his rhetoric. Nice try though.

but yet you do not think it invalidates his(and your) point of view. but acting the same way invalidates my point of view.

 

[NAOS]

Best not to engage him. He's human garbage.

this wasn't out of line, though, Dal.

the reference to The Big Lebowski... that was all kinds of bad. Phew.

 

[Deleted member 848]

Jimmy Eat Jazz is one of the most thoughtful and respectful posters on JF. His statements and questions were reasonable. NAOS seems to only be interested in self-affirmation, even if it involves insulting decent people (like JEJ). Unacceptable.

Completely agree. I can't remember the last time I neg-repped, but I neg'd NAOS when I saw him tell JEJ to shut the **** up. Quite off-base IMO. His entire dialogue was perplexing-- seemed to go after JEJ from the onset, as opposed to just exchanging dialogue. Maybe he's trying to chase the other PhD JFC posters away so he can be the only one

 

[Deleted member 848]

this wasn't out of line, though, Dal.

the reference to The Big Lebowski... that was all kinds of bad. Phew.

lol, as if that makes it more acceptable.

u reap what u sow, gurl.

 

[NAOS]

FWIW,

the reference to the Big Lebowski was a bit of a self-effacing joke. It was Walter telling the Dude and Donny all he knows about security/war/etc.

.... That said, I stand by what I said: accountable policing is the furthest thing from a new concept "in human history."

 

[Deleted member 848]

FWIW,

the reference to the Big Lebowski was a bit of a self-effacing joke. It was Walter telling the Dude and Donny all he knows about security/war/etc.

.... That said, I stand by what I said: accountable policing is the furthest thing from a new concept "in human history."

Never seen the film, so I can't comment on the reference. Doesn't really absolve a string of bizarrely-miliant posts, but that's just my $0.02.

 

[NAOS]

lol, as if that makes it more acceptable.

u reap what u sow, gurl.

that's your fate, too. I've noticed the putdown in your post. It'll be interesting to see how your gender biases impact your life. You're perpetually single and picky, right?

 

[NAOS]

Never seen the film, so I can't comment on the reference. Doesn't really absolve a string of bizarrely-miliant posts, but that's just my $0.02.

I could give fewer than zero ****s about absolution on your terms, tbh.

 

[GVC]

Maybe he's trying to chase the other PhD JFC posters away so he can be the only one

For some reason I thought he didn't complete his PhD. Maybe he just couldn't cut it as an academic. His rants about academia have been both unconvincing and ridiculously self-serving (shocking, I know). At least he regularly gets his ego stroked by all the hot, young poon he's always bragging about bedding.

 

[Stoked]

but yet you do not think it invalidates his(and your) point of view. but acting the same way invalidates my point of view.

I have him on ignore.

Strike 2 amigo.

 

[NAOS]

Nice to know you haven't seen the film, though, so that your ignorance was truly ignorant.... rather than the usual series of self-righteous ****.

 

[NAOS]

For some reason I thought he didn't complete his PhD. Maybe he just couldn't cut it as an academic. His rants about academia have been both unconvincing and ridiculously self-serving (shocking, I know). At least he regularly gets his ego stroked by all the hot, young poon he's always bragging about bedding.

All of this is gross exaggeration. What's wrong with you this morning?

 

[Deleted member 848]

that's your fate, too. I've noticed the putdown in your post. It'll be interesting to see how your gender biases impact your life. You're perpetually single and picky, right?

lolz, keep trying to act like you know anything about me.

I could give fewer than zero ****s about absolution on your terms, tbh.

Now you know how I feel about your psychoanlyses. Is DAl AccUALLY CAnADYUN!?

Nice to know you haven't seen the film, though, so that your ignorance was truly ignorant.... rather than the usual series of self-righteous ****.

Still stand by it being off-base, given JEJ's conduct. Keep crying.

For some reason I thought he didn't complete his PhD. Maybe he just couldn't cut it as an academic. His rants about academia have been both unconvincing and ridiculously self-serving (shocking, I know). At least he regularly gets his ego stroked by all the hot, young poon he's always bragging about bedding.

Roasted. Lmfao.

 

[Deleted member 848]

All of this is gross exaggeration. What's wrong with you this morning?

newsflash-- ppl think you're a prick. Tragically, you're beginning to realize that it's not a view held strictly among the £¥£ clan. You against the world, gurl.

PS: cute retaliatory negrep.

 

[NAOS]

^basically copy-and-paste this in reference to the past 500 years. Probably more.

I'd responded to Bronco70.

If anything, things are far better today than they've been in the past. A police force that is accountable to the people it polices, and which is bound by the rule of law, is a relatively new concept in human history, and even in the US.

JEJ responds to me, and we exchange a few messages....

it isn't a new concept. Not even close. You're revising history from the standpoint of modern calamities. It's a common error, but still a stupid one.

Really?

I'm curious, then. What is the ample historical precedent you believe exists in which a police force (or domestic security force) was held accountable for/and answered to the people they policed, as opposed to the existing power structure? These would include cases in which police or security officers were held to strict standards of rule of law, respected the civil liberties of the people they policed and were somewhat routinely held accountable (e.g., punished) for violating the rule of law/civil liberties. I'm guessing you can cite multiple examples, based on your comment. Remember, these can't be recent (e.g., latter half of 20th century moving forward).

Can't you see how this language will only accept answers from the time of French and American Revolutions to now?! Do you see how this only accepts answers from a liberal perspective on history and power? You realize there were more than 100,000 years of human history before these events, right?

Look into the anthropological record of human history. You'll find ample evidence of chiefs and other local protectors being highly responsive to their people. If you don't like these examples, then you can look into the local control that was given to many provinces within most Empires beginning in about 3200 BC.

You're hyper-recent perspective on history isn't cute.

here's the early history of my interaction of JEJ in this thread. You'll notice that I didn't initially "go after him". You'll also notice that I use some short language... nothing like what GVC or Dalamon would do around here, right? You'll also notice that there was an attempt at a dialogue.

This was difficult research.

 

[NAOS]

lolz, keep trying to act like you know anything about me. .

newsflash-- ppl think you're a prick.

you guys know all about me though, right? So, the prickishness is accurate, right?