At minimum if it has a heart beat it's a human life. If you have to physically crush/kill it its a human life. If you have to stop feeding it to kill it it's a human life.
According to you, but not everyone.
Beantown do you believe there is any reason for an abortion and do you believe that life begins at conception and has equal rights to all other humans at that point?
So it's OK if I say since a baby can't feed itself, walk or even crawl that it's not equal life to a 10 year old?
And with that same justification I can kill it because it provides no value to society right?
You can't just say "according to you" to justify killing humans. That's really ****ed up.
there is no one point where life begins. Instead, the beginning of life is a continuous process. It may have a start where there is "no life" and an end where there "is life," but there isn't a clearly defined boundary. This can be a problem for people who want their world to be black and white and their morals to be absolute,
No I dont believe that nor did I claim that. That is also illogical argument to make. You cant arbitrarily make up what you deem makes life and then apply that same logic to a different scenario. You keep making these straw man arguments, taking what someone said to a place of extreme where you can "easily" prove them wrong. No one here thinks we should go around killing anyone under 10 we want, stop making that your argument. I understand you feel differently than others do on this subject. I guarantee you probably have a different view from everyone on this board to some degree on this subject.
Here is a quote about this I like and believe:
-Life begins at conception
-Abortion legal in cases of rape/incest/health (Doctors approval)
-Can't just throwaway human life like a left over pizza
Is it okay to sell your left over pizza instead of throwing it away?-Life begins at conception
-Abortion legal in cases of rape/incest/health (Doctors approval)
-Can't just throwaway human life like a left over pizza
Yes, people have different views and opinions. But because we all don't agree it justifies aborting unborn babies? Makes no sense.
This make no sense to me according to what you have stated as your beliefs. If you view a born baby the same as an unborn baby why would you be okay with an abortion of a rape victims baby? The baby had nothing to do with the rape. Do you believe that a baby conceived in rape is evil and should be discarded as a left over pizza? What if that baby is born does it that change anything? All human life including fetuses are the same and have the same rights according to you or is there exceptions to all life is equal from the moment of conception?
In the cases of rape/incest it's a violent crime and forcible pregnancy. I don't believe in forcible pregnancy.
So that "human life" has less rights than another human life?
I disagree. I think a 90 dying is less tragic than a five year old.All human life is equal. Doesn't matter if their black, blue, Hispanic, Asian, young, old....or your Mom.
It's just untrue.It's pretty sad that a statement like "all life is equal" is viewed as being self-righteous.
I disagree. I think a 90 dying is less tragic than a five year old.
It's just untrue.
A spider is alive yet not equal in value to a human imo.
And like I said.... If I had to choose between an elderly person dying and a child then I would choose the elderly.
Another funny fact in this forum is that Howard would consider Dutchy as wrong and immoral because he believes the morning after pill is okay and that abortions are okay for rape victims.
do you know how morning after pill works.
edit: with rape i think we need tot ake into account the mental health of the woman. it is unfair to have a woman suffer more from rape for human life. ofcourse in ideal world after rape she should report it and get it taken care of within a day. aka morning after pill.
morning after pill is not the same as abortion pill