What's new
By:

Planned Parenthood Selling Baby Organs

Are the mothers giving consent? If they are I don't see the big deal here. If they aren't, and PP is doing this on their own, then I don't see how there isn't a lawsuit or nasty federal investigation into this.

But the concept of organ harvesting for science of medical reasons shouldn't be foreign to anyone. Our country has been doing this for decades. Just make sure you have consent before its done.
 
I will say this, the anti PP crowd seems to be talking about of both sides of their mouths.

They find abortion disgusting yet don't allow comprehensive sex education to be taught in public schools and want to limit the availability of birth control.

You can't have it both ways.

Want to lower the abortion rate? Comprehensive sex education and birth control.

The abstinence only nonsense has proven in countless states and countries to be ineffective at dropping teen pregnancy or the overall abortion rate.
 
ElRoach0 said:
This is why links are so few and far between. By reading them, the opposing side feels like they're admitting that there may be an issue. It doesn't matter how many people think there's a problem, it doesn't matter how much evidence says "this is an issue", even considering means they've lost.

The only way to win is you have to surprise them into reading something they want to read and somewhere in there change it around on them. Like hiding a pill in a block of cheese to get your dog to eat it.
Click to expand...


my problem with this murder crap is by making the taxpayer pay, you are ine ffect making everybody complicit in this heinous act of murder.
 
The Thriller said:
I will say this, the anti PP crowd seems to be talking about of both sides of their mouths.

They find abortion disgusting yet don't allow comprehensive sex education to be taught in public schools and want to limit the availability of birth control.

You can't have it both ways.

Want to lower the abortion rate? Comprehensive sex education and birth control.

The abstinence only nonsense has proven in countless states and countries to be ineffective at dropping teen pregnancy or the overall abortion rate.
Click to expand...

i for example do not want to limit the availability of birth control.
and depends what you mean comprehensive sex ed. sex ed is the parents choice.
dont want schools to teach kids as pre-teen(age 10 and under) about certain things.
and hell dont want schools to teach that marriage is between 2 gayhomosexual.
 
Broncster said:
Link?

I would like to see this hell report for myself. I wasnt aware that hells pr released statements about what they wanted taught in schools.
Click to expand...
not really a report saw this a few weeks ago about schools teaching. gender identity, sexual identity n sex ed class. just google those words.
so you can choose which sources cater to your political identity.
enough sources from left and right.
i assume washington post is pretty neutral so i give u this one
of course headline it reads transgender issues, but if you read the comprehensive articles about it you yourself can find. it covers any mental disorder the left considers normal in the new cirriculum including gay homosexual relations

https://www.washingtonpost.com/loca...84c7c2-1c14-11e5-93b7-5eddc056ad8a_story.html
 
DutchJazzer said:
my problem with this murder crap is by making the taxpayer pay, you are ine ffect making everybody complicit in this heinous act of murder.
Click to expand...

That's fine. Because the government's hands were bound to help a woman who didn't want a pregnancy, she's now enslaved to living a lifestyle not of her choosing for 9 months. Which is, in effect, causing the government to pay for a heinous act of slavery, kidnapping, and battery.

And you still aren't respecting that there's not enough evidence to even call it murder.
 
ElRoach0 said:
That's fine. Because the government's hands were bound to help a woman who didn't want a pregnancy, she's now enslaved to living a lifestyle not of her choosing for 9 months. Which is, in effect, causing the government to pay for a heinous act of slavery, kidnapping, and battery.

And you still aren't respecting that there's not enough evidence to even call it murder.
Click to expand...

did she get raped?

did she chose to spread her legs!

are we talking about a case fo rape or a case of where a woman CHOOSE to have SEX?

if she got raped yes the criminal justice system should prosecute and get te rapist to pay or the government.


but if she chose to sprea dher legs then why the **** should taxpayers who dont want to pay for it pay for it?
 
ElRoach0 said:
That's fine. Because the government's hands were bound to help a woman who didn't want a pregnancy, she's now enslaved to living a lifestyle not of her choosing for 9 months. Which is, in effect, causing the government to pay for a heinous act of slavery, kidnapping, and battery.

And you still aren't respecting that there's not enough evidence to even call it murder.
Click to expand...

Depending on that exact details of each case i'd agree or disagree.

But Dutch is horrendous.
 
ElRoach0 said:
And you still aren't respecting that there's not enough evidence to even call it murder.
Click to expand...

I actually find myself to be corrected. It's not murder. By definition, murder: the crime of deliberately killing a person.

It's a good thing it's legal, because it almost met the definition of murder. You know, the part where it's deliberately killing a person.

Is it ok to call it, slaughtering, butchering, killing, massacring or is that not appropriate either?

In all seriousness though, I understand why people abort their kids (in most circumstances.) The part I don't understand is where people just can't admit that it's taking an innocent life and make it seem like no big deal. That part ****ing bothers me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top