Sounds cool, doe.
Sorry, not to me.
Sounds cool, doe.
Sorry, not to me.
So, bro, back in 1970 or so, my brother was in the army, an officer trained in chemical warfare. He passed away and I fell heir to his stuff, including his instruction materials. fascinating that way back then the emphasis was on a theoretical war scenario in the middle east.
So China's population explosion was put out by Ford Foundation grants inside communist China in the sixties which supplied the expertise, technology and indoctrination needed to achieve compliance with state-mandated one-child family policy, with scads of women paid to watch out for non-compliant cases so no one could evade it.
When our global managers come to the middle east, the task is not so easy because of the deep religious beliefs, so some of our great thinkers do go wandering down those dark lanes figuring how to discredit that religion, and how to bring the population into check. Without breaking the religious belief, their next option is war. Yes we have hawkish folks like Karl Rove, Zbigneiw Brezenski, others who project that a great war can be manufactured to change the region, bring in compliant thinking, and make it all fit in with the program. It's a bit British in style, but pitting one group against another and letting them duke it out with guns and bombs does keep them from uniting and becoming an independent force on the world stage.
Let's focus on the simple stuff.
The UN program calls for the elimination of firearms from individual ownership/use, and the gradual emplacement of prescribed soldiers to keep the peace.
Who are those soldiers gonna point their guns at?
I went on a rant about population optimums bandied around in the right circles, in the range of 100 M to 500M. Who is gonna pick the approved list?
But to be sure, I want the Royal hunting concession. So I'm In.
You're worrying too much about population control, as if that's an insurmountable problem. As soon as people's living conditions become decent, the derivative of the population curve quickly approaches zero. No need for those grand, decades spanning, clandestine, and sinister tactics. This has been the case all over the world. It seems like so much wasted energy for our "great thinkers" to be expending on Machiavellian schemes to solve problems that solve themselves over time. Specially since improved global economic conditions, and increased buying power, is beneficial to ,the now international, corporations that hold the most power.
Just because the UN program calls for elimination of firearms, doesn't mean terrorists are just going to drop them?
I would imagine countries still needing soldiers to protect the people from these terrorists?
So, bro, back in 1970 or so, my brother was in the army, an officer trained in chemical warfare. He passed away and I fell heir to his stuff, including his instruction materials. fascinating that way back then the emphasis was on a theoretical war scenario in the middle east.
So China's population explosion was put out by Ford Foundation grants inside communist China in the sixties which supplied the expertise, technology and indoctrination needed to achieve compliance with state-mandated one-child family policy, with scads of women paid to watch out for non-compliant cases so no one could evade it.
When our global managers come to the middle east, the task is not so easy because of the deep religious beliefs, so some of our great thinkers do go wandering down those dark lanes figuring how to discredit that religion, and how to bring the population into check. Without breaking the religious belief, their next option is war. Yes we have hawkish folks like Karl Rove, Zbigneiw Brezenski, others who project that a great war can be manufactured to change the region, bring in compliant thinking, and make it all fit in with the program. It's a bit British in style, but pitting one group against another and letting them duke it out with guns and bombs does keep them from uniting and becoming an independent force on the world stage.
He has been friendly with the Clintons and donated money to their campaigns.
The conspiracy theory, as I understand it, was that he joined the race on the R side to muddy the waters and put the republican ticket in disarray. By the time there is a nominee they will be playing catchup to Hillary. If the nominee is Trump then it's a guaranteed win for Hillary. If it's Rubio or Cruz we'll only just start getting to know them as all the attention has been on Trump.
Whoa, whoa, whoa back up a step. You are telling us the Chinese Communist Party is a puppet of the Rockafellers? Where does Vladi fit cozily into this puzzle?