green
Well-Known Member
Best player does not mean best shooter/scorer/guy you want taking the most shots.
I think Hayward is also our best scorer.
Best player does not mean best shooter/scorer/guy you want taking the most shots.
His usage should not go down. It should go up. He is by far our best player. By making Hayward a SF instead of a PG, you should be able to put in a position to take more shots with less defenders around him.
You don't take away shots from Hayward so Hood, Hill, Johnson, Burks, etc can shoot it more. The whole point of Johnson and Hill is to open up the floor and set up Hayward for more shots that have a better chance of going in.
I think the hawks had 4 at the same time.
Teague, kover, sap, horford
Pistons also had 4 all starts back in the day (prince, Hamilton, Wallace, billups) I believe.
Prince has never been an All-STar.
Hayward will be an all-star this year and hopefully we can lock him up long term
Hayward will never be a 23-25 ppg player. He's simply not on that level. Given maximum opportunity he's averaged 19/5/4. That's who he is and that's who he will continue to be. On a championship level team he's a third or fourth scoring option, 12-15 ppg. He's not a 23-25 ppg type who takes over games offensively on a regular basis.
If we are a good team this year as we all expect I think Rudy Gobert will make the All Star team. Our defense should be one of the best in the league which will be a good case for him. Hayward probably won't make it because of more hyped players in the west at the wing position KD, Klay, Harden, Khawi, and so on.
I could see Hayward being an all star next year. But I actually see his minutes per game and points per game going down due to more scoring options and more depth.
At the end of games, you take the ball out of Hayward's hands and put it in Hill's.