What's new

George Hill is a G

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 848
  • Start date Start date
Anyone who maxes out a 31 year old who isn't a bonafide superstar deserves what they get.

Or it reflects fanbase/staff pressure to pursue one of the only good two-way guards without injury concerns on the market. Is Mike Conley a superstar? How many levels better is Mike Conley than George Hill realistically speaking? Compare their production so far this season
 
extra desperate today.

Maybe you can get luck into one or two pumps later... for relief's sake.

my hope is that you've halted them altogether after realizing how ****ing bizarre you come across while typing them
 
my hope is that you've halted them altogether after realizing how ****ing bizarre you come across while typing them

You're lying again.

The most interesting element here is that you can't seem to forget those analyses. It's fair to allege that they struck a serious chord for you. It seems like they revealed something.


But, never mind. Please commence with your bet hedging. You've got an image to patch up.
 
You're lying again.

The most interesting element here is that you can't seem to forget those analyses. It's fair to allege that they struck a serious chord for you. It seems like they revealed something.


But, never mind. Please commence with your bet hedging. You've got an image to patch up.

d'aww I'm lying? About what, hun.


Tbh dont remember any of the content, I just remember laughing at sure of yourself you sounded (recurring NAOSpergers theme on teh JFC), and being mystified with why you were typing them up in the first place. You're weird, braugh
 
Another thread turned into nothing but a cry fest between NAOS and Dalamon.

Awesome...
 
Or it reflects fanbase/staff pressure to pursue one of the only good two-way guards without injury concerns on the market. Is Mike Conley a superstar? How many levels better is Mike Conley than George Hill realistically speaking? Compare their production so far this season

I don't think this is the first place where you've heard the Conely deal was ridiculous.

And he was 27 when he signed his deal - big difference.
 
I don't think this is the first place where you've heard the Conely deal was ridiculous.

And he was 27 when he signed his deal - big difference.

Good point on the age difference. I guess it remains to be seen-- if the Knicks whiff on Jrue Holiday do you really think they wont throw at least 20 million a year at George?
 
I don't think this is the first place where you've heard the Conely deal was ridiculous.

I'd rather have to trade away a late first to get out of Hill's contract(if we have to)than take a huge step back. I don't think Hayward signs if we don't commit to Hill. I don't think this is a Hill or Hayward question.

I also think Hill's game will age well. He relies on length(that isn't going away), he's a good shooter, and he plays smart.
 
Back
Top