What was the issue with the image?
It was depicting something deemed sacred to many in this forum in a cavalier and inappropriate manner.
What was the issue with the image?
Hey Einstein, I mean [MENTION=2530]♪alt13[/MENTION]. Re-posting an image that's been removed by a moderator is generally a ticket to infraction land.
And by the way, posting images that are going to be offensive to the LDS community on jazzfanz is not acceptable. And yes, this includes pics of temple garments.
If you knowingly posted something that you knew would be very offensive to roughly 30% of active jazzfanz members (my estimate, anyway), how is that to be considered light hearted?
couldnt the same be said for that underwearWell the dilemma is you know, it wouldn't actually be an image of Muhammed because no one knows how he looked like exactly so I wouldn't mind.
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz
So you are saying you had several complaints about the other picture before removing it? If you hadn't had any complaints would you have still removed it?
Well the dilemma is you know, it wouldn't actually be an image of Muhammed because no one knows how he looked like exactly so I wouldn't mind.
Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz
Don't be retarded.thats why it gets banned,
but what disturbs me is what i gather form this its okay to offend others but not mormons?
just lost a lil respect for mormons then.
its pretty sad
Don't be retarded.
Okay. Glad to see you're still your usual retarded self. How's that working for ya?reported for using the R word. pretty sure 30% of posters on here find it offensive
Okay. Glad to see you're still your usual retarded self. How's that working for ya?
Plot twist: He was the one who was complaining.
Why do you gather that? If someone posted a picture of tallit katan in a disrespectful way it wouldn't be tolerated either.thats why it gets banned,
but what disturbs me is what i gather form this its okay to offend others but not mormons?
just lost a lil respect for mormons then.
its pretty sad
It was depicting something deemed sacred to many in this forum in a cavalier and inappropriate manner.
Why do you gather that? If someone posted a picture of tallit katan in a disrespectful way it wouldn't be tolerated either.
Why do you gather that? If someone posted a picture of tallit katan in a disrespectful way it wouldn't be tolerated either.
It's not for public display. They represent sacred things and should be sacred.You keep saying in a disrespectful way. How was the manner in which the temple garb was shown disrespectful?
This feels waaaaay overly sensitive here.
recently we had a discussion about jazzfanz being leftist as a whole. this just proves it!
It's not for public display. They represent sacred things and should be sacred.
You keep saying in a disrespectful way. How was the manner in which the temple garb was shown disrespectful?
This feels waaaaay overly sensitive here.
That's fine. If that's the case best to just own up to it. Like "hey I own the site and find this offensive so I'm taking it down. It doesn't really break any rules per se but I don't like it so it goes away". That's the owner's right.
You keep saying in a disrespectful way. How was the manner in which the temple garb was shown disrespectful?
This feels waaaaay overly sensitive here.