What's new

Guess which image Colton removed from the Dallas gamethread

Hey Einstein, I mean [MENTION=2530]♪alt13[/MENTION]. Re-posting an image that's been removed by a moderator is generally a ticket to infraction land.

And by the way, posting images that are going to be offensive to the LDS community on jazzfanz is not acceptable. And yes, this includes pics of temple garments.


thats why it gets banned,

but what disturbs me is what i gather form this its okay to offend others but not mormons?

just lost a lil respect for mormons then.

its pretty sad
 
If you knowingly posted something that you knew would be very offensive to roughly 30% of active jazzfanz members (my estimate, anyway), how is that to be considered light hearted?

recently we had a discussion about jazzfanz being leftist as a whole. this just proves it!
 
So you are saying you had several complaints about the other picture before removing it? If you hadn't had any complaints would you have still removed it?

Plot twist: He was the one who was complaining.
 
Well the dilemma is you know, it wouldn't actually be an image of Muhammed because no one knows how he looked like exactly so I wouldn't mind.


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz

Like this. Prolly.

1024px-Medieval_Persian_manuscript_Muhammad_leads_Abraham_Moses_Jesus.jpg


Muammad-as-youth-meeting-monk-bahira-compendium-persia-1315-edin-550.jpg


Mohammed_kaaba_1315.jpg
 
Plot twist: He was the one who was complaining.

That's fine. If that's the case best to just own up to it. Like "hey I own the site and find this offensive so I'm taking it down. It doesn't really break any rules per se but I don't like it so it goes away". That's the owner's right.
 
thats why it gets banned,

but what disturbs me is what i gather form this its okay to offend others but not mormons?

just lost a lil respect for mormons then.

its pretty sad
Why do you gather that? If someone posted a picture of tallit katan in a disrespectful way it wouldn't be tolerated either.
 
It was depicting something deemed sacred to many in this forum in a cavalier and inappropriate manner.

I'm not a mod (obvi) but all I saw was a closeup of some person (couldn't tell if male or female) in white clothing. Not sure how that's offensive. I do find it offensive however, that of all the things we have removed here, it is something as benign as that and yet we call each other names here, have trolls running rampant, and allow Dutch (redundant here I guess) to return.
 
Why do you gather that? If someone posted a picture of tallit katan in a disrespectful way it wouldn't be tolerated either.

You keep saying in a disrespectful way. How was the manner in which the temple garb was shown disrespectful?

This feels waaaaay overly sensitive here.
 
It's not for public display. They represent sacred things and should be sacred.

Why? What is the obgliation on everyone else to respect as sacred what certain religious sects view as sacred?

Religion, religious belief, religious icons, what religions consider sacred as just as subject to comment, critique, satire, ridicule, mockery,etc. as any thing else. There are, nor should there be, sacred cows; otherwise, freedom is diminshed and the powerful can insultate themselves from public scrutiny, which is never a good thing.

Avoiding giving offense to LDS board partiicpants by making light of what they consider sacred (in this case at least) is done as a matter of courtesy to fellow members of the Jazzfanz community, and is a concession to foster a harmonious community, NOT because we have any obligation, moral or otherwise, to accord the same level of sacredness to those things they do.
 
You keep saying in a disrespectful way. How was the manner in which the temple garb was shown disrespectful?

This feels waaaaay overly sensitive here.

Sensitivity and, if many are honest with themselves, embarrasment. Heaven knows, back in the day, I was embarrased as hell to be seen outside LDS communities wearing those damn silly things.
 
That's fine. If that's the case best to just own up to it. Like "hey I own the site and find this offensive so I'm taking it down. It doesn't really break any rules per se but I don't like it so it goes away". That's the owner's right.

You keep saying in a disrespectful way. How was the manner in which the temple garb was shown disrespectful?

This feels waaaaay overly sensitive here.

Really it's probably more the top quote then anything else, but LDS in general find depiction of the garment in any way shape or form to be offensive. It is partly the fact that LDS hold then to be sacred and partly the fact that it is HEAVILY indoctrinated to keep anything related to the temple a secret. My wife got chewed out by the temple pres in Reno because my daughter confirmed in front of him that the experience was just as my wife had partially described it to her before she went through for the first time before her mission. He pulled my wife aside to remind her it is highly inappropriate to discuss any part of the ceremony outside the temple. My wife had only answered her questions because a friend of my daughter showed her the entire temple ceremony online with running commentary claiming it is actually masonic and satanic. So yeah Mormons get a little weird and highly ruffled when it comes to anything related to the temple.
 
Top