You're retarded. Posting a picture that was already removed is asking for a double infraction. Retarded.
Is still retarded.It's not retarded. It's needy.
Dude is smart enough to know what you explained.. but needy enough to do it anyway.
Get it right, Bigbelectric
Is still retarded.
And I'm feeding the victim attitude by talking about it.
So which was it?
Hey Einstein, I mean [MENTION=2530]♪alt13[/MENTION]. Re-posting an image that's been removed by a moderator is generally a ticket to infraction land.
And by the way, posting images that are going to be offensive to the LDS community on jazzfanz is not acceptable. And yes, this includes pics of temple garments.
Not sure, it's never come up. If several of them were to complain, quite possibly.Would an image of Muhammed be removed to avoid offending any Muslim board members? Just curious.
If you knowingly posted something that you knew would be very offensive to roughly 30% of active jazzfanz members (my estimate, anyway), how is that to be considered light hearted?Yes I am aware of which group you can't offend around here.
Second it was completely light hearted.
Third, yeah I knew that you would fract me for reposting what you removed.
If you knowingly posted something that you knew would be very offensive to roughly 30% of active jazzfanz members (my estimate, anyway), how is that to be considered light hearted?
Not sure, it's never come up. If several of them were to complain, quite possibly.
Would an image of Muhammed be removed to avoid offending any Muslim board members? Just curious.
ah, the deeper side of philosophy. . . . I remember my class at the U where the required reading included reflection on the euphoria of people dying from anoxia. . . . much like coping with life in JazzFanz community.
sentiment unhinged.
alt is the only student I have left who's still interested in my class.
Why do yo feel the need to parent everyone?
So you are saying you had several complaints about the other picture before removing it? If you hadn't had any complaints would you have still removed it?
This particular situation followed our normal moderating procedure. Someone reported the post. The mods discussed it and decided to remove the image. It was deemed fairly innocuous so ♪alt13 was not given an infraction. Then, when he decided to start this thread and repost the image, he was given an infraction for that.