Guess which image Colton removed from the Dallas gamethread

[babe]

If you knowingly posted something that you knew would be very offensive to roughly 30% of active jazzfanz members (my estimate, anyway), how is that to be considered light hearted?

ah, the deeper side of philosophy. . . . I remember my class at the U where the required reading included reflection on the euphoria of people dying from anoxia. . . . much like coping with life in JazzFanz community.

sentiment unhinged.

alt is the only student I have left who's still interested in my class.

 

[LogGrad98]

Not sure, it's never come up. If several of them were to complain, quite possibly.

So you are saying you had several complaints about the other picture before removing it? If you hadn't had any complaints would you have still removed it?

 

[addictionary]

Would an image of Muhammed be removed to avoid offending any Muslim board members? Just curious.

Well the dilemma is you know, it wouldn't actually be an image of Muhammed because no one knows how he looked like exactly so I wouldn't mind.


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz

 

[Boris]

ah, the deeper side of philosophy. . . . I remember my class at the U where the required reading included reflection on the euphoria of people dying from anoxia. . . . much like coping with life in JazzFanz community.

sentiment unhinged.

alt is the only student I have left who's still interested in my class.

Why do yo feel the need to parent everyone?

 

[addictionary]

Why do yo feel the need to parent everyone?

Because he is more enlightened than the most of us and wants to share but we are too dumb to listen.


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz

 

[colton]

So you are saying you had several complaints about the other picture before removing it? If you hadn't had any complaints would you have still removed it?

This particular situation followed our normal moderating procedure. Someone reported the post. The mods discussed it and decided to remove the image. It was deemed fairly innocuous so ♪alt13 was not given an infraction. Then, when he decided to start this thread and repost the image, he was given an infraction for that.

 

[Siro]

I didn't know they were temple garments. Thought it was from an underwear catalog or something. Didn't know what the fuss was about.

 

[Miggs]

This particular situation followed our normal moderating procedure. Someone reported the post. The mods discussed it and decided to remove the image. It was deemed fairly innocuous so ♪alt13 was not given an infraction. Then, when he decided to start this thread and repost the image, he was given an infraction for that.

What was the issue with the image?

 

[colton]

What was the issue with the image?

It was depicting something deemed sacred to many in this forum in a cavalier and inappropriate manner.

 

[DutchJazzer]

Hey Einstein, I mean [MENTION=2530]♪alt13[/MENTION]. Re-posting an image that's been removed by a moderator is generally a ticket to infraction land.

And by the way, posting images that are going to be offensive to the LDS community on jazzfanz is not acceptable. And yes, this includes pics of temple garments.

thats why it gets banned,

but what disturbs me is what i gather form this its okay to offend others but not mormons?

just lost a lil respect for mormons then.

its pretty sad

 

[DutchJazzer]

If you knowingly posted something that you knew would be very offensive to roughly 30% of active jazzfanz members (my estimate, anyway), how is that to be considered light hearted?

recently we had a discussion about jazzfanz being leftist as a whole. this just proves it!

 

[DutchJazzer]

Well the dilemma is you know, it wouldn't actually be an image of Muhammed because no one knows how he looked like exactly so I wouldn't mind.


Sent from my iPhone using JazzFanz

couldnt the same be said for that underwear