What's new

Which sg-sf rookie will have the best career?

which rookie will have the best career?

  • Gordon Hayward

    Votes: 29 54.7%
  • Evan Turner

    Votes: 3 5.7%
  • Wesley Johnson

    Votes: 9 17.0%
  • Landry Fields

    Votes: 2 3.8%
  • Paul George

    Votes: 9 17.0%
  • Jordan Crawford

    Votes: 1 1.9%

  • Total voters
    53
Not sure what doesn't make sense, this thread was any body drafted not just those after. And while saying I was hopping Aminu would fall to the Jazz (meaning I acknowledged the Jazz couldn't have gotten him thanks to the Clippers not drafting like the Clippers historically have) and then lastly if Hayward ends up being better then anybody drafted before him then that is only a MILD success for KOC (because those teams had an even better pick and messed up even more).

Now to clarify I'm not really commenting directly on how or if Hayward will turn out.

If that doesn't help then I guess I'm just not able to articulate my thought out well enough, oh well.

Here's what you said:
Most of these recent threads had people drafted after Hayward, if he ends up being better then anyone drafted before him then I would also consider that at least a minor success for KOC.

I'm saying that it doesn't make any sense to call it a minor success for KOC if Hayward turns out better than someone drafted before him because O'Connor has nothing to do with who was chosen before it was his turn to pick. By your logic there were an awful lot of minor successes the year the Clips drafted Olowakandi. It was a Clipper fail, not a victory by anybody else.
 
It just makes me wonder what Washington is gonig to do? Maybe just role with Wall, Young, Crawford? Or ditch Young? And doesn't that trade make Atlanta look a little foolish? They should of traded Jamall Crawford instead Jordan Crawford

thats a good question,
i think young is more valuable, he is really talented, but while u have wall, u can give away young if u get something good in return, i would use young to get another top pick in this years draft, in addition to their pick. im sure cavs would be interested in giving their clippers pick
 
Here's what you said:


I'm saying that it doesn't make any sense to call it a minor success for KOC if Hayward turns out better than someone drafted before him because O'Connor has nothing to do with who was chosen before it was his turn to pick. By your logic there were an awful lot of minor successes the year the Clips drafted Olowakandi. It was a Clipper fail, not a victory by anybody else.
Okay that is what I meant, it's just my opinion of a minor success due to the others failing more is what was in question. I guess I'm just an optimistic in that if that happens I can say well at least KOC isn't as bad as <insert GM name>
But ya I can see your point as well.
 
Anyone remember the love fest with Turner on there boards last year. What happened to that.
I think Turner will still be a pretty good player. Right now, the Sixers aren't a great fit - too many guys on that team (Iggy, Thaddeus Young) who are scorers, slashers and not shooters. Turner's a 2 who needs to handle the ball alot - like a Brandon Roy. and with the players surrounding him (their PG's Holliday and Williams also dominate the ball-handling) - that can't happen.
 
I think Turner will still be a pretty good player. Right now, the Sixers aren't a great fit - too many guys on that team (Iggy, Thaddeus Young) who are scorers, slashers and not shooters. Turner's a 2 who needs to handle the ball alot - like a Brandon Roy. and with the players surrounding him (their PG's Holliday and Williams also dominate the ball-handling) - that can't happen.

Sounds like the Jazz need to swoop on him the way they swooped on Favors.

SWOOOP SWOOP!
 
From this day forward, I'd take Hayward. I'm a George fan too, and he has had better stats (and a longer leash), but Hay's recent run is no fluke.
 
From this day forward, I'd take Hayward. I'm a George fan too, and he has had better stats (and a longer leash), but Hay's recent run is no fluke.[/QUOTEand agree. I've been touting him as a future Allstar and star since before the start of his second season. He's starting to develop into a more aggressive offensive player. You don't see him passing up open layups anymore. Also he has improved his ball handling skills from last year, and I'm hopefull he'll have another such improvement next year, which would make him our Harden type player.
 
I think Turner will still be a pretty good player. Right now, the Sixers aren't a great fit - too many guys on that team (Iggy, Thaddeus Young) who are scorers, slashers and not shooters. Turner's a 2 who needs to handle the ball alot - like a Brandon Roy. and with the players surrounding him (their PG's Holliday and Williams also dominate the ball-handling) - that can't happen.

No
 
Nope.


This is fun.

Lol

You are funny NAOS


Its funny that his team is pretty darn good for a guy that sucks. Whats this, his third year?

Also if you go back and look, I didnt have many power forwards to choose from. The only questionable guys I passed up were Webber and Kemp. Hardly a huge mistake passing them up. All the greats were taken at that point. Bigs were flying off the board.
 
Lol

You are funny NAOS


Its funny that his team is pretty darn good for a guy that sucks. Whats this, his third year?

Also if you go back and look, I didnt have many power forwards to choose from. The only questionable guys I passed up were Webber and Kemp. Hardly a huge mistake passing them up. All the greats were taken at that point. Bigs were flying off the board.

I think it's funny too. I mean, bumping old predictions is great fun. Especially when dude's like you are batting 1.000
 
Back
Top