What's new
By:

Donald Fires FBI Director who's investigating Russian Election Hacking

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 365
  • Start date Start date
moevillini said:
LOL, good one. I think he has one planned for the 12th of Never.

but talk about a poker face...
Click to expand...

LOL .. yup.. imagine someone defending Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky with:


"Of course that relationship was inappropriate, but The President's NEW AT THIS".
 
DutchJazzer said:
there is also the media that cried trump since he anounced his nomination
Click to expand...
Only problem is that Trump was not treated more unfair than other candidates. During the election process there were less negative stories and more positive stories about Trump in comparison to Clinton during that time.

Just because the media brings attention to his lies a questions him does not mean they are treating him unfair right now. He deserves all the negative attention he is getting. When you lie or deceive people it's the media job to call you out.

Thankfully a lot of the media is doing a great job.
 
babe said:
So Colton clicked a "like" on this, but I remember his stated reason for not voting for Hillary: "She's A Liar".
Click to expand...

That's certainly one of the reasons. But did she lie as much as Trump has been? Not even close in my opinion. Someone said it well, I think in this thread, that Hillary was about 90% truth and 10% lie, but she sold the lie very well as if it were the truth. Trump is basically the reverse: 90% lie and 10% truth. And as a result no one believes him on those rare moments that he does tell the truth. See: story of the boy who cried wolf.

It is evident to me that Colton is "in the tank" for the Republican "resistance"...
Click to expand...

Not sure what you mean by that. I am not "in the tank" for anyone. I have my own opinions, just like you have yours.
 
DutchJazzer said:
no offense we seem to live in different world
Click to expand...

Yep, this is based on facts with evidence not how you feel. It's pretty easy to look up. I posted the multiple studies done on this already but I'm sure you cast then off as fake and stuck to your anecdotal evidence.
 
Ron Mexico said:
Yep, this is based on facts with evidence not how you feel. It's pretty easy to look up. I posted the multiple studies done on this already but I'm sure you cast then off as fake and stuck to your anecdotal evidence.
Click to expand...


mine isn't anecdotal. some groups did also studies. showing that trump was bombarded with negative news. during primaries and general.
harvard study about 2 weeks ago showed 93% negative coverage of trump.
new york times 87% negative
look not trying to start a fight with you brother.


and to be hones tonly skin i have in the game. is usa foreign policy towards israel and potentially the eu/nato. and the stockmarket and for-ex/crypto-ex are way up. which has been making a killing(although people sya it's a OBAMA leftover.


but i amhappy in a good place. lets hold hands and sing kumbaya
 
Last edited:
This might just be the true next great turning point in American history, the moment Trump took over as a true dictator. We'll have to take deep breaths if the racist hatemongers actually feel they have won the country. What we thought could happen when he won may be about to happen at that.

If you're Trump, do you fire Mueller? What choice would you have, of course you would. Backed into a corner, he'll strike first. Fire Mueller and depend on the GOP to repel the Dems, ignore the press, crack down on public demonstration. Just what Putin is himself doing in Russia. It will be loud for awhile, token Republican resistance. But the Republican leadership are traitors to their country and Constitution. Just as Trump is. Goodbye liberal democracy in America. Goodbye the Rule of Law.

Sorry to be negative, just trying to follow the mind of a tyrant and a party that's fine with tyranny, and this feels like the next stage. Long live the Rule of Law. Long live the Resistance!

https://nymag.com/daily/intelligenc...too-crazy-to-fire-the-special-prosecutor.html
 
DutchJazzer said:
mine isn't anecdotal. some groups did also studies. showing that trump was bombarded with negative news. during primaries and general.
harvard study about 2 weeks ago showed 93% negative coverage of trump.
new york times 87% negative
look not trying to start a fight with you brother.


and to be hones tonly skin i have in the game. is usa foreign policy towards israel and potentially the eu/nato. and the stockmarket and for-ex/crypto-ex are way up. which has been making a killing(although people sya it's a OBAMA leftover.


but i amhappy in a good place. lets hold hands and sing kumbaya
Click to expand...
Let's see those studies, you also left out the comparison.

Or are you talking current coverage of Trump? Because that is a meaningless stat, with nothing to compare it to. The reason it is mostly negative is because there is mostly only negative things he is doing.

I am talking about during the election time when we can compare his coverage to Clinton's coverage.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top