You would need to listen to Alex Jones, especially when he has Roger Stone on as his guest, talking about the "insider" thing. Sure, everybody knows Jeb Bush and Mitt Romney and McCain view Trump as an upstart, a phony Republican, and will never give Trump anything remotely connected to actual support. A lot of people call the Bush league Republicans "RINOs".
Mark Levin and Sean Hannity would concur to a degree. Levin decries the "Chamber of Commerce Republicans and the McConnell/Ryan element. Hannity decries them all as do-nothing re-election machines.
I probably find CNN, NYTimes, Wash Post and a hundred other "progressive" sorts of news spinners as unreadable as you would find the radio talk shows. But I do read/listen to them. I just find them freakin dishonest. When I can, I will listen to Andrew Wilkow and Breitbart as paragons of credibility, but frankly the voice, style and intellect of David Webb (http://www.davidwebbshow.com/) is the most palatable of them all.
At any rate, choose your consciousness stream and swim in it all you want. I chose mine after listening to, and hating, the mainstream for decades, before Rush Limbaugh broke the silence for common sense Americans.
I find Thriller, b proof, and Red laughable actually. Yes, I know they love and believe their sources for their views. credulity, I call it. So without actually discussing the points, they(and you, it seems) just diss whatever.
how in the world could anyone think Hillary is more honest than Trump. Or Bill. I don't think Trump has ever fact-checked anything on the so-called fact-checking outfits. I wouldn't either. Millions of dollars in the Clinton Foundation coming in largish chunks from Russian, Saudi, dozens of other interests in pretty tight timelines corresponding to actions Hillary took as Sec State, and the fact checkers just couldn't see any connection...... but hey..... Trump is selling out America for nothing.... for Zilch, Nada..... with scores of Mueller Hillaryites on the job poring over every possible record. But Hillary gets an all-clear from Mueller's honcho Comey. Bottom line, the Fact-Checkers lose credibility the same way media does when failing to make obvious connections essential to the story, which most common sense humans just will never believe is possible without deliberate lies, bias, and agenda.
Are you freakin f'real, bro? You cannot possibly be serious in thinking Trump is the more corrupt, or the bigger liar.
but oh, you ignored all the news in the last two years, and attribute my information and sources as my own imagination. No, HIllary did acknowledge most of the essential facts, she just professed innocence.
It's the bottom line fact, people believe what they love. Not very many will assess things critically if their fond beliefs are at risk. I have done it, I deliberately try to do it. Most of my posts in here are jabs at folks somehow, I imagine, in need of doing it as well.
After all this time, the fact that some just simply talk over the points and facts I present must mean, reasonably speaking, that they are themselves determined propagandists rather than simple citizens believing the news is actually the reality.
Last edited:
