Not really. He's just owed 11 million next year and 3 million guaranteed in 2019. I'd take that on for a first rounder, especially if they took Burks. It'd be a no brainer.Asik's contract is terrible.
Not really. He's just owed 11 million next year and 3 million guaranteed in 2019. I'd take that on for a first rounder, especially if they took Burks. It'd be a no brainer.Asik's contract is terrible.
Neither Asik or Ajina are terrible contracts. If New Orleans is actually willing to trade a first round pick, they could trade both players. They are just owed a combined 15 million next year and 3 million in 2019. A ton of teams (including the Jazz, especially if they actually wanted Burks) would be willing to do that.
However, no one is trading a first round pick to get Burks and just dump Ajinca's small *** contract.
Can you read? He said Ajinca and Asik. He didnt say *or*.Yep, you're right Cy. Those contracts are great. Or as Woj put is moribund. Maybe you need a dictionary...
New Orleans is limited in its tradable assets. No one is taking the moribund contracts of Omer Asikand Alexis Ajinca without the Pelicans including a first-round draft pick -- if not more -- in the deal.
Can you read? He said Ajinca and Asik. He didnt say *or*.
If NOLA came to the Jazz right now and said Asik/Ajinca/1st round unprotected for Burks, DL would be dumb as hell not to do that.
Yeah, but wouldn't you have to give up Johnson or Favors rather than Burks?If Utah's position is to hold in 2018 UFA and go all in on 2019, taking on Asik/Ajinca for a first rounder would be a solid move.
You know Asik has an extra year on that deal right?If Utah's position is to hold in 2018 UFA and go all in on 2019, taking on Asik/Ajinca for a first rounder would be a solid move.
They are owed a combined 16 million next year and 3 million in 2019. Utah isnt going to be a player in 2018 UFA unless they do some major salary dumping and who would they sign? Parker? That would be a huge risk to spend assets necessary to dump enough money (ie trading Burks for an expiring) just to offer Parker a max when the Bucks could and probably would match.According to your logic Cy, the Pelicans wouldn't consider Asik and a 1st for Burks. That's because New Orleans stays in the exact same
You just said they weren't bad. I'm sorry, you said "Neither Asik or Ajina are terrible contracts".
Both are awful.
http://www.spotrac.com/nba/new-orleans-pelicans/omer-asik-7110/You know Asik has an extra year on that deal right?
Not really. He's just owed 11 million next year and 3 million guaranteed in 2019. I'd take that on for a first rounder, especially if they took Burks. It'd be a no brainer.