What's new

Hood traded to Cleveland for Crowder; Johnson to Sacramento

Just now learned this and only read one page of the thread. But doesn't this make resigning Favors more likely now because it gives the Jazz more financial flexibility?
 
Just now learned this and only read one page of the thread. But doesn't this make resigning Favors more likely now because it gives the Jazz more financial flexibility?
I would say depends on the price and if Favs really wants to stay.
 
I asked a question. I’m not following your answer. Thanks.

Of course a player who takes fewer shots will by definition pass more. There's only three things you can do with your "touches": shoot, pass, turn it over. The sum will always be 100%.
 


You can tell in 2 minutes of this video how much more engaged he seems compared to his time in Cleveland. I understand it's a highlight video but I don't remember anything from Crowder this year other than just sitting around waiting for LeBron to do something.
 
How many times does Utah Jazz need to make these money saving trades before fans finally realize they only care about the profit margin? Same thing, different year.
 

Cool. So Crowder's true shot since Jan (way down from last year) is better than Hood's career-best true shooting percentage this half season.

I'm not sure what is there to be upset over. If Crowder works out, and I think it is likely he does, then great. If not, that's still better than paying Hood 18m a year or some ****.
 
How many times does Utah Jazz need to make these money saving trades before fans finally realize they only care about the profit margin? Same thing, different year.

Don't act dumb. It doesn't matter if you're willing to spend, there's salary cap rules and Jazz are positioning themselves to not hamstring themselves by the cap.
 
Cool. So Crowder's true shot since Jan (way down from last year) is better than Hood's career-best true shooting percentage this half season.

I'm not sure what is there to be upset over. If Crowder works out, and I think it is likely he does, then great. If not, that's still better than paying Hood 18m a year or some ****.

I think they're playing that risk that Hood does get a contract like that. It'll suck if he gets like a $12 per though.
 
Back
Top