What about this trade with Washington?

[utahjazz107]

Wizards receive:
3rd Pick, Raja Bell


Jazz receive:
6th Pick, Nick Young


PG: Harris/Knight/Watson
SG: Young/Burks/Miles
SF: Hayward/AK47
PF: Millsap/Favors
C: Jefferson/Okur

 

[Dr. Jones]

Knight may not be there at #6. I may do #3 and Bell for Knight and Young. I would not do it if I replaced Knight with Walker.
(I'd really stick and take Kanter ... )

 

[The Midnight]

Any moves that put Hayward at SF gets a No from me.

He's tall & quick enough to guard SG, but not strong enough (yet) to guard SF.

I just don't like the idea of a strong SF like LeBron posting up on Hayward.

So no.

 

[utahjazz107]

Any moves that put Hayward at SF gets a No from me.

He's tall & quick enough to guard SG, but not strong enough (yet) to guard SF.

I just don't like the idea of a strong SF like LeBron posting up on Hayward.

So no.

So you're going to vote down a trade because Hayward has to play the 3? He's a pretty strong kid and has always been projected to play small forward.

 

[Darkwing Duck]

Nick Young is a free agent, and he's definitely not good enough to warrant dropping three slots. Bell is a neutral asset, not a negative one, so he doesn't affect the value of the trade.

 

[utahjazz107]

Nick Young is a free agent, and he's definitely not good enough to warrant dropping three slots. Bell is a neutral asset, not a negative one, so he doesn't affect the value of the trade.

He's a restricted free agent which means he can re sign with the team anytime after the Finals. Anyways how is 17.4 points per game not worth moving down 3 spots? What do we have to get in return? LeBron?

 

[The Midnight]

So you're going to vote down a trade because Hayward has to play the 3? He's a pretty strong kid and has always been projected to play small forward.

Yeah absolutely.

KOC said it before, he wants players who plays bigger than his position (or something along those line).

I agree with that theory.

I don't like Hayward at SF because he'll play small for that position.

 

[Darkwing Duck]

He's a restricted free agent which means he can re sign with the team anytime after the Finals. Anyways how is 17.4 points per game not worth moving down 3 spots? What do we have to get in return? LeBron?

Can't sign until the new CBA.

And did you know that Young had the same PER last year as Miles? Which basically means he produces the same offensively as CJ Miles. He's also statistically MUCH worse than Miles on the defensive end, and you want to drop down three slots for that?

 

[billyshelby]

The masochist in me would love it if the Jazz acquired Nick Young. The Miles haters would just love Nick Young.

 

[vslice02]

The masochist in me would love it if the Jazz acquired Nick Young. The Miles haters would just love Nick Young.

Grass is always greener...

 

[BENTLEY]

Nick Young is a free agent, and he's definitely not good enough to warrant dropping three slots. Bell is a neutral asset, not a negative one, so he doesn't affect the value of the trade.

This.

 

[NUMBERICA]

I want no part of Nick Young. I may be willing to take him if it moves the Jazz up three spots in a draft, but no way would I in an opposite proposal.