What about this trade with Washington?

[Saint Cy of JFC]

If you're so passionate about playing Hayward at SF - then let us hear a proper argument from you instead of starting off calling someone an idot and not backing up your claim.

I do not care if Hayward plays SF or SG. He is a versatile player who should be treated as such. Too say he is only a SG, or only a SF, would be incredibly stupid. We should get the best possible player, whether that player is a 6'4 SG or a 6'8 SF shouldn't matter.

 

[vslice02]

...for a roll player

Not to pick on your grammar , but reminds me of a story from "7 Seconds or Less," where Alvin Gentry talks about when he was with Miami and some scrub player stood up during a team meeting and wrote "NO YOUR ROLL" on the whiteboard. Glen Rice said: "Sit down, dumbass."

 

[The Midnight]

I do not care if Hayward plays SF or SG. He is a versatile player who should be treated as such. Too say he is only a SG, or only a SF, would be incredibly stupid. We should get the best possible player, whether that player is a 6'4 SG or a 6'8 SF shouldn't matter.

I'm not saying that he's only a SG - when did I say that?

What I mean is "I don't like any move that would put him predominantly at the SF position".

Yes I agree he's versatile and can fill in the SF if need be - but I would rather play him mostly at SG.

 

[LogGrad98]

Not to pick on your grammar , but reminds me of a story from "7 Seconds or Less," where Alvin Gentry talks about when he was with Miami and some scrub player stood up during a team meeting and wrote "NO YOUR ROLL" on the whiteboard. Glen Rice said: "Sit down, dumbass."

Uh....I don't get it.