What's new

What about this trade with Washington?

Would you do this trade?

  • yes

    Votes: 2 11.1%
  • no

    Votes: 12 66.7%
  • maybe

    Votes: 4 22.2%

  • Total voters
    18
i like young but this trade is unnecessary, why would we give 3rd pick for young while we have hayward, i think hayward would play better at 2 rather than 3
 
Would anyone do this, and would the wiz. do this?

Jazz give up the third pick and Bell

Wiz. Give up #6 McGee, Crawford

Not sure if I woud do it, also not sure the wiz. do it ether, but it's better than Young.

Lineup.....

Harris Knight (assuming he is there at #6)
Hayward Crawford
Cj Hayward Millsap (when the matchup calls for it)
Jefferson Favors Millsap
McGee Favors Okur

Now before you blast me on Al starting over Favors. Listen.....

Favors is still young and very raw on offense let him come off the bench the first half of the season, then trade Al for the final piece that makes us a contender, maybe a small forward.

If anything it's an intriguing thought.
 
Would anyone do this, and would the wiz. do this?

Jazz give up the third pick and Bell

Wiz. Give up #6 McGee, Crawford

Not sure if I woud do it, also not sure the wiz. do it ether, but it's better than Young.

Lineup.....

Harris Knight (assuming he is there at #6)
Hayward Crawford
Cj Hayward Millsap (when the matchup calls for it)
Jefferson Favors Millsap
McGee Favors Okur

Now before you blast me on Al starting over Favors. Listen.....

Favors is still young and very raw on offense let him come off the bench the first half of the season, then trade Al for the final piece that makes us a contender, maybe a small forward.

If anything it's an intriguing thought.

Except Realistically the Wizards would never accept that deal. They trade their main defensive player and a great backup for moving up 3 spots. They would probably trade with Minny before us
 
what about trading our 3rd pick for just the 6th pick and JaVale McGee? I dont think they would include Crawford because he showed some real potential towards the end of the season, i dont want nick young because he is a high volume shooter that doesn't play much defense. with that said, McGee would give us a 4th big who will play great defense. Paired with Jefferson you have the balance of a scoring big (Jefferson) who is decent at defense and a decent offensive player in McGee who is really good at defense. Bring Favors off the bench until he is ready to take McGee's spot. Milsap is the odd man out and you could then give him a year to try SF and if it doesn't work, trade him for a wing player. This trade here seems to work out for all of the teams involved:
https://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=65baych
It gives the Clippers a -6 but if the Jazz picked up on CJ's option and then traded him instead of Raja that would be higher, and i'm not sure how the jazz lose 2 more games with that lineup.
If both things happened this lineup could be scary good in a few years
PG Harris, Jimmer (12), Watson (resign)
SG Gordon, Bell/Miles
SF Hayward, Leonard (6), Evans
PF Jefferson, Favors
C McGee, Favors, White
 
Any moves that put Hayward at SF gets a No from me.

He's tall & quick enough to guard SG, but not strong enough (yet) to guard SF.

I just don't like the idea of a strong SF like LeBron posting up on Hayward.

So no.

You are an idiot. You are one of the main supporters of this bogus theory that Hayward is incapable of playing SF, and for this I hate you.

Also, Nick Young is basically CJ Miles (with better shooting, but weaker everything else) who chucks even more. Most everyone on here would hate him after a couple of months.
 
You are an idiot. You are one of the main supporters of this bogus theory that Hayward is incapable of playing SF, and for this I hate you.

Also, Nick Young is basically CJ Miles (with better shooting, but weaker everything else) who chucks even more. Most everyone on here would hate him after a couple of months.

This is going to be my last post until draft day. I'm getting tired of draft talk and my assessments are totally lame.

.
 
Wizards To Work Out Kanter

Jun 13, 2011 10:11 PM EDT
Kanter_Enes_ncaa_100410.jpg
During the NBA combine in Chicago last month, Kanter expressed his desire to play for the Wizards and possibly team with his “good friend” John Wall.
The Wizards interviewed the 6-foot-11 Kanter in Chicago but had been hoping to arrange another meeting with him before the June 23 draft in Newark.
The 19-year-old Kanter missed all of last season at Kentucky because of violating NCAA eligibility rules and is projected to go anywhere from second to sixth.

Via Michael Lee/Washington Post


Read more: https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/214107/Wizards_To_Work_Out_Kanter#ixzz1PDPqvHNY

Lets hope they fall in love with Kanter and put a trade with the Jazz in place, if Knight falls to them.
 
You are an idiot. You are one of the main supporters of this bogus theory that Hayward is incapable of playing SF, and for this I hate you.

Also, Nick Young is basically CJ Miles (with better shooting, but weaker everything else) who chucks even more. Most everyone on here would hate him after a couple of months.

If you're so passionate about playing Hayward at SF - then let us hear a proper argument from you instead of starting off calling someone an idot and not backing up your claim.
 
Back
Top