What's new
By:

What about this trade with Washington?

Would you do this trade?

  • yes

    Votes: 2 11.1%

  • no

    Votes: 12 66.7%

  • maybe

    Votes: 4 22.2%
  • Total voters
    18
utahjazz107

utahjazz107

Active Member
Wizards receive:
3rd Pick, Raja Bell


Jazz receive:
6th Pick, Nick Young


PG: Harris/Knight/Watson
SG: Young/Burks/Miles
SF: Hayward/AK47
PF: Millsap/Favors
C: Jefferson/Okur
 
Knight may not be there at #6. I may do #3 and Bell for Knight and Young. I would not do it if I replaced Knight with Walker.
(I'd really stick and take Kanter ... )
 
Any moves that put Hayward at SF gets a No from me.

He's tall & quick enough to guard SG, but not strong enough (yet) to guard SF.

I just don't like the idea of a strong SF like LeBron posting up on Hayward.

So no.
 
Hotttnickkk said:
Any moves that put Hayward at SF gets a No from me.

He's tall & quick enough to guard SG, but not strong enough (yet) to guard SF.

I just don't like the idea of a strong SF like LeBron posting up on Hayward.

So no.
Click to expand...

So you're going to vote down a trade because Hayward has to play the 3? He's a pretty strong kid and has always been projected to play small forward.
 
Nick Young is a free agent, and he's definitely not good enough to warrant dropping three slots. Bell is a neutral asset, not a negative one, so he doesn't affect the value of the trade.
 
Darkwing Duck said:
Nick Young is a free agent, and he's definitely not good enough to warrant dropping three slots. Bell is a neutral asset, not a negative one, so he doesn't affect the value of the trade.
Click to expand...


He's a restricted free agent which means he can re sign with the team anytime after the Finals. Anyways how is 17.4 points per game not worth moving down 3 spots? What do we have to get in return? LeBron?
 
utahjazz107 said:
So you're going to vote down a trade because Hayward has to play the 3? He's a pretty strong kid and has always been projected to play small forward.
Click to expand...

Yeah absolutely.

KOC said it before, he wants players who plays bigger than his position (or something along those line).

I agree with that theory.

I don't like Hayward at SF because he'll play small for that position.
 
utahjazz107 said:
He's a restricted free agent which means he can re sign with the team anytime after the Finals. Anyways how is 17.4 points per game not worth moving down 3 spots? What do we have to get in return? LeBron?
Click to expand...

Can't sign until the new CBA.

And did you know that Young had the same PER last year as Miles? Which basically means he produces the same offensively as CJ Miles. He's also statistically MUCH worse than Miles on the defensive end, and you want to drop down three slots for that?
 
I want no part of Nick Young. I may be willing to take him if it moves the Jazz up three spots in a draft, but no way would I in an opposite proposal.
 
i like young but this trade is unnecessary, why would we give 3rd pick for young while we have hayward, i think hayward would play better at 2 rather than 3
 
Would anyone do this, and would the wiz. do this?

Jazz give up the third pick and Bell

Wiz. Give up #6 McGee, Crawford

Not sure if I woud do it, also not sure the wiz. do it ether, but it's better than Young.

Lineup.....

Harris Knight (assuming he is there at #6)
Hayward Crawford
Cj Hayward Millsap (when the matchup calls for it)
Jefferson Favors Millsap
McGee Favors Okur

Now before you blast me on Al starting over Favors. Listen.....

Favors is still young and very raw on offense let him come off the bench the first half of the season, then trade Al for the final piece that makes us a contender, maybe a small forward.

If anything it's an intriguing thought.
 
Thee jazz fan said:
Would anyone do this, and would the wiz. do this?

Jazz give up the third pick and Bell

Wiz. Give up #6 McGee, Crawford

Not sure if I woud do it, also not sure the wiz. do it ether, but it's better than Young.

Lineup.....

Harris Knight (assuming he is there at #6)
Hayward Crawford
Cj Hayward Millsap (when the matchup calls for it)
Jefferson Favors Millsap
McGee Favors Okur

Now before you blast me on Al starting over Favors. Listen.....

Favors is still young and very raw on offense let him come off the bench the first half of the season, then trade Al for the final piece that makes us a contender, maybe a small forward.

If anything it's an intriguing thought.
Click to expand...

Except Realistically the Wizards would never accept that deal. They trade their main defensive player and a great backup for moving up 3 spots. They would probably trade with Minny before us
 
what about trading our 3rd pick for just the 6th pick and JaVale McGee? I dont think they would include Crawford because he showed some real potential towards the end of the season, i dont want nick young because he is a high volume shooter that doesn't play much defense. with that said, McGee would give us a 4th big who will play great defense. Paired with Jefferson you have the balance of a scoring big (Jefferson) who is decent at defense and a decent offensive player in McGee who is really good at defense. Bring Favors off the bench until he is ready to take McGee's spot. Milsap is the odd man out and you could then give him a year to try SF and if it doesn't work, trade him for a wing player. This trade here seems to work out for all of the teams involved:
https://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=65baych
It gives the Clippers a -6 but if the Jazz picked up on CJ's option and then traded him instead of Raja that would be higher, and i'm not sure how the jazz lose 2 more games with that lineup.
If both things happened this lineup could be scary good in a few years
PG Harris, Jimmer (12), Watson (resign)
SG Gordon, Bell/Miles
SF Hayward, Leonard (6), Evans
PF Jefferson, Favors
C McGee, Favors, White
 
Hotttnickkk said:
Any moves that put Hayward at SF gets a No from me.

He's tall & quick enough to guard SG, but not strong enough (yet) to guard SF.

I just don't like the idea of a strong SF like LeBron posting up on Hayward.

So no.
Click to expand...

You are an idiot. You are one of the main supporters of this bogus theory that Hayward is incapable of playing SF, and for this I hate you.

Also, Nick Young is basically CJ Miles (with better shooting, but weaker everything else) who chucks even more. Most everyone on here would hate him after a couple of months.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top