What's new

What about this trade with Washington?

Would you do this trade?

  • yes

    Votes: 2 11.1%
  • no

    Votes: 12 66.7%
  • maybe

    Votes: 4 22.2%

  • Total voters
    18
You are an idiot. You are one of the main supporters of this bogus theory that Hayward is incapable of playing SF, and for this I hate you.

Also, Nick Young is basically CJ Miles (with better shooting, but weaker everything else) who chucks even more. Most everyone on here would hate him after a couple of months.

This is going to be my last post until draft day. I'm getting tired of draft talk and my assessments are totally lame.

.
 
Wizards To Work Out Kanter

Jun 13, 2011 10:11 PM EDT
Kanter_Enes_ncaa_100410.jpg
During the NBA combine in Chicago last month, Kanter expressed his desire to play for the Wizards and possibly team with his “good friend” John Wall.
The Wizards interviewed the 6-foot-11 Kanter in Chicago but had been hoping to arrange another meeting with him before the June 23 draft in Newark.
The 19-year-old Kanter missed all of last season at Kentucky because of violating NCAA eligibility rules and is projected to go anywhere from second to sixth.

Via Michael Lee/Washington Post


Read more: https://basketball.realgm.com/wiretap/214107/Wizards_To_Work_Out_Kanter#ixzz1PDPqvHNY

Lets hope they fall in love with Kanter and put a trade with the Jazz in place, if Knight falls to them.
 
You are an idiot. You are one of the main supporters of this bogus theory that Hayward is incapable of playing SF, and for this I hate you.

Also, Nick Young is basically CJ Miles (with better shooting, but weaker everything else) who chucks even more. Most everyone on here would hate him after a couple of months.

If you're so passionate about playing Hayward at SF - then let us hear a proper argument from you instead of starting off calling someone an idot and not backing up your claim.
 
If you're so passionate about playing Hayward at SF - then let us hear a proper argument from you instead of starting off calling someone an idot and not backing up your claim.

I do not care if Hayward plays SF or SG. He is a versatile player who should be treated as such. Too say he is only a SG, or only a SF, would be incredibly stupid. We should get the best possible player, whether that player is a 6'4 SG or a 6'8 SF shouldn't matter.
 
...for a roll player
Not to pick on your grammar :D, but reminds me of a story from "7 Seconds or Less," where Alvin Gentry talks about when he was with Miami and some scrub player stood up during a team meeting and wrote "NO YOUR ROLL" on the whiteboard. Glen Rice said: "Sit down, dumbass."
 
I do not care if Hayward plays SF or SG. He is a versatile player who should be treated as such. Too say he is only a SG, or only a SF, would be incredibly stupid. We should get the best possible player, whether that player is a 6'4 SG or a 6'8 SF shouldn't matter.

I'm not saying that he's only a SG - when did I say that?

What I mean is "I don't like any move that would put him predominantly at the SF position".

Yes I agree he's versatile and can fill in the SF if need be - but I would rather play him mostly at SG.
 
Not to pick on your grammar :D, but reminds me of a story from "7 Seconds or Less," where Alvin Gentry talks about when he was with Miami and some scrub player stood up during a team meeting and wrote "NO YOUR ROLL" on the whiteboard. Glen Rice said: "Sit down, dumbass."

Uh....I don't get it.
 
Back
Top