Election Prediction Thread

[Alfalfa]

View attachment 6349

Stop it. His kids will see that!

 

[Deleted member 5000]

Stop it. His kids will see that!

Who said I had kids? you? endlessness assumptions

 

[Gameface]

It is sadly funny to me that the people who think they know the secret truths and accuse the rest of us of having our heads in the sand are the ones that are going to enable actual government tyranny.

 

[Deleted member 5000]

here you are thinking i'm hispanic with multiple kids, your're horrible, what party you vote?

 

[Alfalfa]

It is sadly funny to me that the people who think they know the secret truths and accuse the rest of us of having our heads in the sand are the ones that are going to enable actual government tyranny.

But they are such independent thinkers! They won't believe it unless it's an uneducated, uniformed quack who says it.

 

[Deleted member 5000]

 

[Zombie]

Yes?

 

[fishonjazz]

****** tu madre

Very very trumpish. Good job

 

[Stoked]

****** tu madre

Pero no quiero que tu madre se sienta sola

 

[DutchJazzer]

So you compare liberals to Nazis, what a strange twist. Plus you seem to mix some things up. You attribute good Nazi to Trump and bad Nazis to liberals. Weird. You are really out there, DJ So you say the EPA and gun control are bad things -- wow, you are nuts. It seems you conflate the good things that liberals believe in with the Holocaust. Good try but you failed miserably. So you are a dumb nut. What can I say. I like pecans the best.

no. i am just saying to you that national sociaolism. is exaclty that socialism with a nationalistic twist to it. i showed u some of those left wing socialist polcieis.
and yes EPA is bad. they have no accountability! and is useless for the government to have an epa

yes gunctonrol is bad! i dont want gun control.

i did not compare trump to "good nazis. or liberals to bad nazi.

i showed u why national socialism is a socialist ideology, by showing u those policies they have!

all socialist policies are bad there are no good nazis or bad nazis. i just wanted to help you out in a numerous way and say the left en right where both against "gayness" ofcourse i am rigth wing, i dont think there exist such a thing as gay marriage. but if a man wants to marry a man by their defintion of marrigae they can do whatever they want. i could have said hitler drank water so did trump. so they are the same. but then i would say drinking water has nothing to do with politics


all socialist policies are bad there are no good nazis or bad nazis. but there are naive/stupid nazis/socialist/communist and there are evil ones.
the difference being the evil ones use these left wing systems they know they are wrong.
and the naive ones who think it is the way forward to a good live. the rood to hell is paved with good intentions.
i know think one brow is an evil socialist, on you i am still not sure

make no mistake national socialism/nazism is a socialist policy, so unless you invented right wing socialism. the nazis are left wing. and trum is mostly doing the opposite of socialism

 

[Keefe]

Gunctonrol FTW!

 

[DutchJazzer]

if we are gonna compare politicians to other politicians. dont be suprised if i actually compare their policies and see if the majority of policies align!

nice fact if you read mein kampf. hitler rambles on about something called whit eprivilige. sorry did i say white privilige, i meant something jew privilege!
lots of intersectionality in his stoopid book.

ever wonder why governments ban it? i dont know! i want everyone to read it, i want everyones eyes to be open!
if the people who peer review papers ever read mein kampf, they would have recognized it, when 2 "trolls/russian bots" did this
https://www.foxnews.com/us/academic-journal-accepts-feminist-mein-kampf

The summary of the feminist version of Mein Kampf reads: “Feminism which foregrounds individual choice, responsibility, female agency, and strength can be countered by a feminism which unifies in solidarity around the victimhood of the most marginalized women in society.”

The paper was based on a rewriting of Chapter 12 of Volume I of Mein Kampf, in which Hitler lays out a multi-point plan why the Nazi Party was needed and what it required of its members.

The paper was accepted after being peer-reviewed by Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, which analyzes gender inequality.

edit: some other sources cus i understnad lefties not trusting ffox. like i dont trust cnn!
https://www.timesofisrael.com/duped...-rewrite-of-mein-kampf-as-feminist-manifesto/
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opin...-hypatia-mein-kampf-racism-column/1575219002/
just google that **** on duckduckgo and you will see different sources. then chose 1 you turst

 

[DutchJazzer]

Gunctonrol FTW!

wow is that a hitler qoute or a mao qoute.
not sure which.
ooh noo wait it is a stalin qoute!

so confusing

 

[Keefe]

wow is that a hitler qoute or a mao qoute.
not sure which.
ooh noo wait it is a stalin qoute!

so confusing

That’s a Dumb quote.

 

[Stoked]

https://www-m.cnn.com/2018/11/08/po...ospitalized/index.html?r=https://www.cnn.com/

Two immediate reactions:

1. Ginsburg is a badass

2. How long before Trump pounces on this. By 2pm MT?

 

[Alfalfa]

The administration just posted a doctored infowars video of the press conference to justify their attacks on that CNN reporter.

These people should be in jail, not in the White House.

 

[RandyForRubio]

More evidence of the divide most manifested by this:



Real estate not popularity is what’s keeping republicans in business at the senate level.

Ok. Let’s talk about this, because these basic numbers are being manipulated by a lack of knowledge of basic civics.

At the time of that tweet there were something like 35 senate seats up for re-election. The Democrat party won 23 of those (I think. Might’ve been higher). So that’s about 66% of the available seats that they won (at the time of that tweet).

Now, each individual senate race in a state is a straight popular vote. A national popular vote for the senate is completely and totally irrelevant.

Now California, a very populous state, had one senate race obviously. Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat, won with a little over 54% of the vote. Her opponent, WHO WAS ALSO A DEMOCRAT, got the remaining votes. So what does that mean? It means in one of the most populous states in the US, all of the senate votes went to the Democrat party. So I would certainly hope that they have more national votes than any other party, even though it’s irrelevant.

Anyways, long story short, that number is skewed because of California only having two Democrats to vote for in the election, and in the end, a national popular vote for the senate is completely irrelevant.

 

[RandyForRubio]

Somebody copy and paste that so @thriller can read it.

 

[One Brow]

Ok. Let’s talk about this, because these basic numbers are being manipulated by a lack of knowledge of basic civics.

At the time of that tweet there were something like 35 senate seats up for re-election. The Democrat party won 23 of those (I think. Might’ve been higher). So that’s about 66% of the available seats that they won (at the time of that tweet).

Now, each individual senate race in a state is a straight popular vote. A national popular vote for the senate is completely and totally irrelevant.

Now California, a very populous state, had one senate race obviously. Dianne Feinstein, a Democrat, won with a little over 54% of the vote. Her opponent, WHO WAS ALSO A DEMOCRAT, got the remaining votes. So what does that mean? It means in one of the most populous states in the US, all of the senate votes went to the Democrat party. So I would certainly hope that they have more national votes than any other party, even though it’s irrelevant.

Anyways, long story short, that number is skewed because of California only having two Democrats to vote for in the election, and in the end, a national popular vote for the senate is completely irrelevant.

IAWTP

 

[Stars Fan]

I don’t think we’re “screwed up” so much as polarized.

Having a balance of power is a good thing under trump. He needs to start facing accountability.

The issue that is concerning to me is the polarization we see not between liberal or conservative, but between white rural non-college educated and everyone else. These people are falling behind economically but socially as well. They carry with them a resentment and anger that fuels fascism. They’re so disconnected with 21st century economics and social norms.

This matters because they control the senate due to their control of the majority of America’s Landmass.

So while America’s population continues to trend towards diversity, urbanization, and advanced education, the other side trends the other way.

I don’t meant to disbarage White rural non-college Educated, but how do you expect to function in this 21st century ever dependent on service jobs in urban centers that require more education?

And is it good for America to be ruled (in the senate) by a number of large west and southern states with values and priorities so divergent to the rest of the country? The senate won’t vote for women’s rights or climate change because these aren’t the priorities of the majority of states yet they are top priorities of the majority of the country’s population. The senate after tonight will increasingly be the minority of the country ruling over the majority.

If we survive this Trump led chaos, and I think we will, this will be seen as the beginning of the end of the Republican party. They are winning now on issues that the rising, educated, generation oppose. Fear fades, and when it does the lie will be exposed. OZ can't protect the man behind the curtain forever. Women's rights, gun violence, isolationism, freedom of the press, free trade, huge deficits, defense alliances, and global warming & the environment are all losing issues with younger voters. It may take some time, but Trump will wreck the Republican party.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using JazzFanz mobile app