What's new
By:

Fact-Checkers........

Ron Mexico said:
Lol, we all get it @babe, you dont believe in facts. You think that whatever pops in your head is more accurate than any research or others ideas. Cool, thats why there is no reason to have a serious discussion with you. I dont think you are a liar. You just are ill informed and there is no reasoning with you. You listen to known liars and believe them over people with actual facts, and yes facts do exist.

Also stop complaining about a personal attack when you have done it to others. You cant call people names and not expect to get called names back.
Click to expand...

Tell us more. I always like reading when non-scientists tell scientists they are irrational and unreasonable for questioning things and expecting a deeper thought process to prevail.

We get it, you are annoyed by that message and want it to go away.
 
babe said:
So the reason I chose Snopes is because I did a little investigation of it some months ago, and imo found it was not really impartial, though it does a great pretension/profession of impartiality. The bias is deliberate, and smart. They also won't answer questions about their funding sources. So it's selling a POV. Like most of us.
Click to expand...

How did you come to that conclusion and where is the source for your info on that?

People who dont like their info have claimed they are getting their funding from George Soros but that is just silly baseless claims with no evidence. Snopes has provided information about their funding. You can look it up and see it. But that would require actual research which you didnt do.
 
@babe their is very little interest here in what constructivism is and how it has taken over education. Mention it to a non-scientist and they'll preach to you about science through their anti-science lenses.
 
idestroyedthetoilet said:
Tell us more. I always like reading when non-scientists tell scientists they are irrational and unreasonable for questioning things and expecting a deeper thought process to prevail.

We get it, you are annoyed by that message and want it to go away.
Click to expand...

Ya, I saw babe doing that about evolution, climate change, and everything in between. Good point.
 
This is really hilarious. Babe is the poster child for "oh you believe the subject's experts? You shouldn't. Now let me tell you what to think".

****ing hysterical.
 
Ron Mexico said:
How did you come to that conclusion and where is the source for your info on that?

People who dont like their info have claimed they are getting their funding from George Soros but that is just silly baseless claims with no evidence. Snopes has provided information about their funding. You can look it up and see it. But that would require actual research which you didnt do.
Click to expand...

From your inability to read or understand what was written, then followed up by a random Soros rant.
 
idestroyedthetoilet said:
Tell us more. I always like reading when non-scientists tell scientists they are irrational and unreasonable for questioning things and expecting a deeper thought process to prevail.

We get it, you are annoyed by that message and want it to go away.
Click to expand...

Scientist or not has nothing to do with it. I am not annoyed by any message nor do I want it to go away. Whatever that "message" is. I have no problem with people with different ideas and information. I do have a problem with people calling other people names, mocking them constantly, and telling them they are smarter. I have a problem with people claiming everyone else is dumb if they dont believe them and they have 0 evidence of something. I have a problem with people pushing lies and misinformation and claiming other people are just dumb because they actually did some research on it. Then getting upset with people calling them names back.

Its great the once in a blue moon where @babe actually has real sources and information about something but that is extremely rare. Most of the time its just regurgitating talking heads on the radio he just listened to and claiming them as facts and the real info. I listen to the same people. Most of his rants are the same rants I heard on the radio that day from Hannity or similar.

Also I am a scientist. I am an expert in my field and have been published in journals multiple times for my research. That still has nothing to do with this and gives me no more credibility to discuss things on this message board.
 
idestroyedthetoilet said:
From your inability to read or understand what was written, then followed up by a random Soros rant.
Click to expand...
Thats how Babe got his info is from my inability to read and then went off on a soros rant? I mean that seems like how he gets his info so I guess I agree. He generally gets it from some crap source like me and then goes off on a soros rant, so yep, im in agreement with you.
 
Ron Mexico said:
Thats how Babe got his info is from my inability to read and then went off on a soros rant? I mean that seems like how he gets his info so I guess I agree. He generally gets it from some crap source like me and then goes off on a soros rant, so yep, im in agreement with you.
Click to expand...

Complaining about someones info from your own bad info and assumptions is a dumb argument to put forth.
 
idestroyedthetoilet said:
Complaining about someones info from your own bad info and assumptions is a dumb argument to put forth.
Click to expand...

I was just agreeing with you. But I guess you are claiming the opposite? No, people should not rely on me for info. I also didnt provide info, I just asked where his came from. Then stated that there is a good source for the info he claimed didnt exist.I know you feel the need to stick up for babe so I am sure you will dig in.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top