idestroyedthetoilet
Well-Known Member
So then, what he really wants is a place where conservatives can mock liberals and feel safe from liberals mocking him in return?
For me, the whole conservative typology doesn't really work much anymore as today's Republican Party has, in the post-Trump world, rejected such long-held, conservative principles such as: limited government (e.g., opposition to Executive overreach), low deficits, support for NATO and other post-WW II alliances, free trade, character in public servants, support for intelligence agencies, personal accountability and law & order (not that they were ever for it, per se, it's always just been for the little guy), opposition to strong-men who threatened the world order, etc.
To be honest, why would someone not observe what's happened to the Republican Party in the post-Trump world and not conclude that so many of the conservative principles it has so long espoused were not borne of actual, principled commitment but rather out of what was convenient, as long as it was the other team doing what it supposedly didn't like?
BTW, I'm a progressive who believes ardently in capitalism, free trade, individual rights, strong national defense, world engagement, many of the thing conservatives profess to believe. I also believe in prudential regulation, protecting the weak and marginal, balancing efficiency and equity, avoiding unwise foreign entanglements, challenging entrenched power structures, strict separation of church and state, and making the rules of the game fairer. In other words, balance. I tire of the 'either or' mentality that dominates politics.
For me, I begin with a set of first principles and then go from there. My dominant first principles are economic, social, and political justice and personal freedom. In real life, they often conflict, so I'm interested in how we can best manage the tradeoffs to produce a just, equitable, free, and prosperous society. If you want to talk about that, I'm game. Conservative philosophy has a lot to offer to the debate; Trumpism has almost nothing to offer to it.
That's not true. Pushback on the unitary executive traditionally and consistently comes from the party out of the House while support for it comes from the party in.
Why do people act like this is a new thing with every single president?