A Place for Conservatives

[NAOS]

Heathme said: ↑
He was RARELY held accountable for anything.



https://www.investors.com/politics/editorials/think-obama-administration-wasnt-corrupt-think-again/

https://www.investors.com/politics/...-executive-orders-blame-obamas-pen-and-phone/

https://www.heritage.org/political-process/commentary/obamas-scandal-free-administration-myth

you're such a partisan hack. Incredible.

 

[Heathme]

you're such a partisan hack. Incredible.

Right back at you NAOS. You try to portray yourself as some brilliant thinker and you just spout the same crap over and over.

 

[Alfalfa]

Boy, you guys get pretty emotional about this stuff. I state some facts, show where the facts are documented and you jump in here like a bunch of 3 year olds.

Seriously how old are you Alfalfa? You act like my nine year old did when he was 4 with your "waaaaah" crap.

I didn't actually read any of your posts. I'm just skimming through and I see "ABC, MSNBC, CNN" in many of them, and I recognize it as a movie I've seen before. So I make fun of it. And if only you knew how little my emotional investment is in your opinion...

 

[Heathme]

I didn't actually read any of your posts. I'm just skimming through and I see "ABC, MSNBC, CNN" in many of them, and I recognize it as a movie I've seen before. So I make fun of it. And if only you knew how little my emotional investment is in your opinion...

Sweet, I will throw you on ignore then so I don't have to see your waste of space again.

 

[Alfalfa]

Sweet, I will throw you on ignore then so I don't have to see your waste of space again.

Okay then?

 

[NAOS]

Right back at you NAOS. You try to portray yourself as some brilliant thinker and you just spout the same crap over and over.

What have I said? You're assuming I'm a CNN, MSNBC, etc. lover.
The only thing I've said (or implied) consistently in this interaction is that you have an agenda; and this agenda has been formed for you. I've given you opportunities to show me otherwise, and you've totally failed to even swing swing the bat.

 

[Zombie]

Honest question for you Heathme- do you understand what an op-ed is?

 

[jimmy eat jazz]

Article on the proof that tech companies are censoring conservatives.

https://thehill.com/opinion/technol...a-tough-fight-as-big-techs-censorship-expands

Just jumping in here to note that if you think this piece, which is essentially, an Op-Ed piece written by Trump Jr. that does little but cite anecdotes, constitutes "proof," you have a very, very loose definition of the term.

Also, since the Right is so dead set against Gov intervention in the free market and so opposed to prudential regulation and inclined to give private companies a very long leash, that conservatives are so apoplectic about private info companies determining how to distribute info on their platforms, strikes me as, shall we say, a bit inconsistent. I say, if Payday Lenders and For-Profit Colleges are free to shaft consumers (as recent Trump Admin policies would suggest), Facebook is free to determine how to disseminate info on its platforms. (Interestingly, Facebook is also one of the prime disseminators of right wing conspiracy BS, so there's that.)

I would also note that, despite cries about media bias (there's no doubt that bias exists in most media outlets), the experience of Fox teaches us clearly that the Right is not concerned about media bias, per se, but left wing media bias specifically; right wing media bias is just fine. I strongly suspect that were left wing bias to disappear completely tomorrow, and the media were dominated by right leaning outlets, folks like Heathme would largely not utter a peep in complaint. There are now plenty of right wing media outlets now, so for God's sake, quit whining about it and quit acting as if the thought of media bias is so offensive. You clearly like it, just the right kind.

 

[Heathme]

Honest question for you Heathme- do you understand what an op-ed is?

Yep.

 

[Heathme]

Just jumping in here to note that if you think this piece, which is essentially, an Op-Ed piece written by Trump Jr. that does little but cite anecdotes, constitutes "proof," you have a very, very loose definition of the term.

Also, since the Right is so dead set against Gov intervention in the free market and so opposed to prudential regulation and inclined to give private companies a very long leash, that conservatives are so apoplectic about private info companies determining how to distribute info on their platforms, strikes me as, shall we say, a bit inconsistent. I say, if Payday Lenders and For-Profit Colleges are free to shaft consumers (as recent Trump Admin policies would suggest), Facebook is free to determine how to disseminate info on its platforms. (Interestingly, Facebook is also one of the prime disseminators of right wing conspiracy BS, so there's that.)

I would also note that, despite cries about media bias (there's no doubt that bias exists in most media outlets), the experience of Fox teaches us clearly that the Right is not concerned about media bias, per se, but left wing media bias specifically; right wing media bias is just fine. I strongly suspect that were left wing bias to disappear completely tomorrow, and the media were dominated by right leaning outlets, folks like Heathme would largely not utter a peep in complaint. There are now plenty of right wing media outlets now, so for God's sake, quit whining about it and quit acting as if the thought of media bias is so offensive. You clearly like it, just the right kind.

Read the article jimmy. Here is some actual evidence. You can find more on these findings if you do a bit of research:
"Thanks to a brave Facebook whistleblower who approached James O’Keefe’s Project Veritas, we now know that Mark Zuckerberg’s social media giant developed algorithms to “deboost” certain content, limiting its distribution and appearance in news feeds. As you probably guessed, this stealth censorship was specifically aimed at conservatives."

 

[NAOS]

Yep.

clearly you don't.

 

[Heathme]

I would also note that, despite cries about media bias (there's no doubt that bias exists in most media outlets), the experience of Fox teaches us clearly that the Right is not concerned about media bias, per se, but left wing media bias specifically; right wing media bias is just fine. I strongly suspect that were left wing bias to disappear completely tomorrow, and the media were dominated by right leaning outlets, folks like Heathme would largely not utter a peep in complaint. There are now plenty of right wing media outlets now, so for God's sake, quit whining about it and quit acting as if the thought of media bias is so offensive. You clearly like it, just the right kind.

Believe it or not, I hate media bias on all sides. It just rarely happens towards liberals. You do realize that there is a difference between opinion shows on Fox, CNN, MSNBC, etc vs. news shows on each of these stations. Opinion shows are biased and meant to appeal to their audience. It is in the regular news shows where the liberal bias is at its worst.