What's new

Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?

Will You Accept the Findings of the Muller Probe?


  • Total voters
    29
I quite fully understand what you are saying and appreciate your responses. I dont need a civics lesson.

My point is that we need to solve inconsistencies in the moral outrage before we can agree.

You claim this is about upholding the law, but you only seen focused on the law being upheld for just one person. And might I add, you are not being consistent with the laws. It is innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around. Even for the president. You and everyone else on the left have already deemed Trump guilty a long time ago. And you were wrong about it. Now you want to move onto the next thing and deem him guilty. The attorney General of the United States has made the decision to uphold the law, and you dont like that. So there is another inconsistency in your stance. You also dont seem to concerned with the abuse of power by the FBI in their political attack on Trump either.

The president isnt above the law, but he surely isnt below it either. He deserves the same due process and protections as any other citizen, despite what @fishonjazz says.
Lol.
He clearly is above the law.
And I was talking about you comparing Trump not condemning things to blm not condemning things. That was your comparison.
I would hope that the president would act in a better way than blm. I hold the president to a higher standard.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
I noticed you didnt refute that you are a boot licker.

Hurry up pleb. One Brow needs his boots cleaned.

Maybe I like the taste of boots. They have to be better than the taste of Donnie's dingleberries.

Fake edit; As this forums foremost expert, what do they taste like? Are they better with Whole, 2% or Skim?
 
I’m assuming that no one on this thread condones the notion of shooting immigrants. At a trump rally, a person shouted “shoot them” the crowd laughed and cheered and trump joked.

I have not heard trump or his followers distance themselves from this.

Giving trump supporters a chance to comment to condemn this and refute the deplorable narrative.

I wonder about the different response if a BLM rally shouted “shoot them” about white nationalists. Just curious.

While this sort of thing has gotten worse under Trump, it’s been bubbling for quite some time. Remember this gem? I know our little Kentucky boy on this forum was here cheerleading these lame *** gun nuts white supremacists on. Anyone remember this? It’s not like trumpism evolved out of a vacuum. The right has been harboring authoritarianism for a while now

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/richard-mack-_n_5154606

A former Arizona sheriff who supported a Nevada rancher in his land dispute with the federal government says he would have put women in the frontline if officers started shooting.

An armed standoff between Cliven Bundy and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management over grazing rights ended with the federal government abandoning its plans on Saturday to impound Bundy’s cows that roamed public lands.

Richard Mack, a Bundy supporter who served as sheriff of Graham County, Ariz., between 1988-1997, told Fox News on Monday about a planned strategy if “rogue federal agents” had opened fire.

“We were actually strategizing to put all the women up at the front,” he said on Fox News, according to TheBlaze.com. “If they are going to start shooting, it’s going to be women that are going to be televised all across the world getting shot by these rogue federal officers.”
 
You are pretty far left. Do you support Maduro? Do you know of any American politicians who support Maduro? Does the American Democratic Party support Maduro? Yes, Maduro is very far left and CNN got something wrong about him, but unless I'm mistaken the American Left is fortunately very much anti-Maduro, so your claim is absurd.

So, when you meant "missing to the right", you meant only "missing on some center-left politician in the US"? This is why definitions matter.
 
FYI

The entirety of the Muller report has been made to 6 Democrats who refuse to read it. With the exception of 2 full lines and 7 partial lines, out of the 448 page.

To read briefly, not examine.

Ya, there is so much info in there that will get Trump if we could just see that remaining .0001 percent of the Muller report.

There's plenty in what has already been released to get Trump.
 
Maybe I like the taste of boots. They have to be better than the taste of Donnie's dingleberries.

Fake edit; As this forums foremost expert, what do they taste like? Are they better with Whole, 2% or Skim?

Tastes like sweet and juicy oranges grown out of the dirt and worms of the left.
 
To read briefly, not examine.



There's plenty in what has already been released to get Trump.

Haha. What do you mean read briefly? How much examination do they need? Is their comprehension that slow? They need to take it home and read it 45 times with a dictionary at their side?

Cmon. This is where we are now. Now its about not being able to take it home and study it? Good hell. This is getting so ridiculous. The goal posts just keep moving.

Let me guess whats next. The font is too small to read.
 
Why read articles from a source that you believe to be bias/incorrect? Just seems like a strange thing to do

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
So what you are saying is that I am a conservative so I ought to stick to right wing news sources that simply confirm my opinions? That seems like strange advice, but I have noticed that many liberals refuse to read information from sources that they deem conservative so apparently this sort of thinking makes sense to some people.
 
Back
Top