fishonjazz
Well-Known Member
Contributor
2018 Award Winner
2019 Award Winner
20-21 Award Winner
2022 Award Winner
2023 Award Winner
2024 Award Winner
2025 Award Winner
Lol.I quite fully understand what you are saying and appreciate your responses. I dont need a civics lesson.
My point is that we need to solve inconsistencies in the moral outrage before we can agree.
You claim this is about upholding the law, but you only seen focused on the law being upheld for just one person. And might I add, you are not being consistent with the laws. It is innocent until proven guilty, not the other way around. Even for the president. You and everyone else on the left have already deemed Trump guilty a long time ago. And you were wrong about it. Now you want to move onto the next thing and deem him guilty. The attorney General of the United States has made the decision to uphold the law, and you dont like that. So there is another inconsistency in your stance. You also dont seem to concerned with the abuse of power by the FBI in their political attack on Trump either.
The president isnt above the law, but he surely isnt below it either. He deserves the same due process and protections as any other citizen, despite what @fishonjazz says.
He clearly is above the law.
And I was talking about you comparing Trump not condemning things to blm not condemning things. That was your comparison.
I would hope that the president would act in a better way than blm. I hold the president to a higher standard.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app