jazzfan1971
Well-Known Member
It makes sense. Favors could either be A) a useful piece for the Jazz, or B) A positive value trade chip, or C) represent cap space. A and B both require we resign him, and if you can find a team that values him more than cap space then B>C. I think a team like Sacramento would pay more for Favors than simply getting cap space. There are probably over 5 teams in the league that would rather have him than straight salary relief.
So, this move seems to just be a sensible one. Either we get and use Favors, or get more value out of him than we would if we cut him.
So, this move seems to just be a sensible one. Either we get and use Favors, or get more value out of him than we would if we cut him.