NAOS
Well-Known Member
I'm not saying he gets stretched right away. But that dude is getting stretched eventually.No way. A contract that size, being stretched, would still significantly affect them and for how long?
I'm not saying he gets stretched right away. But that dude is getting stretched eventually.No way. A contract that size, being stretched, would still significantly affect them and for how long?
why are you asking this question AGAIN?Would the Jazz and Horford have mutual interest in playing 14 minutes at the 5 and 14 at the 4 for us?
Is he purely a 5 now?
If we keep Favors then no. But if we waive Favors then yes we would still have money after trading for Conley.
Boston media speculating on Horford. Story is he has a 4-year 100 million offer.
Boston media believes it is from Brooklyn because Horford and Kyrie are close.
Dallas talking heads claim Mavericks have offered the 4/100 to Horford because it matches their timeline.
I wonder what team is willing to pay him that much? Seems like way too much money for Horford. Maybe Dallas?
\\
Boston media speculating on Horford. Story is he has a 4-year 100 million offer.
Boston media believes it is from Brooklyn because Horford and Kyrie are close.
Dallas talking heads claim Mavericks have offered the 4/100 to Horford because it matches their timeline.
That’s a big number. And in a Conley trade we’d be giving salary back. Are we sure we wouldn’t have anything left over to use if we got him?
This stuff confuses the hell out of me.
Sounds great. We should do that.If the Jazz pick up Favors' option, that takes $17M or so off the top, so cut that number in half as a starting point.