What's new
By:
Filters

What type of candidate can beat Trump?

NPC D4617 said:
Funny.

99% of Hollywood is liberal.

Celebrities = not good politicians and leaders(according to you)

So that must mean

Liberals do not equal good leaders and politicians.

I mean, it makes sense. Grownups detached from reality dont have a good sense of what works and what is realistic. And it makes perfect sense that Hollywood is 99% liberal.

Also, Donald Trump is 99% business man and 1% celebrity. He was doing business long before he had his show. So lets cut the crap and stop try to pretend that where he comes from.
Click to expand...

Hack, a master of logic.
 
Et tu Brute said:
Yeah I think you're overating political experience.
Life experience, an actual vision, a 'theology' of worldview and fundamental values... That is more important than the skills you are talking about.

You wanna know why Trump will win again ... it's not cause of who he is. That only enabled him the spotlight to share what he stood for. His message and views defending western civilisation and the crisis of confidence it faces in light of left-wing extremism and zealots from overseas are the reasons he won and will win again.
Click to expand...

If he wins again it is because a fraction vote pro life no matter how terrible the person

Another fraction vote low regulatory enforcement and taxes because it puts money into the trust fund, no matter how hideous the president.

And another fraction is terrified of the little brown people entering our country. Instead of being horrified by racist birtherism and other bigotry, they embrace it.

A fraction have been brainwashed by the carnival barker and actually believe he is competent.

All that said, any other prez with this sort of economy would be in the 60 % approval and not 40s. So there are enough moral and decent Americans to vote this clown out of office.
 
Gameface said:
I think it will be the downfall of our great nation if that's the path we take.

Liberal celebrities are no better than conservative celebrities in this regard.
Click to expand...

I am not sure anymore.....

The vision is what is most important. The vision can't be vague - but it must be concrete and reflect the
silesian said:
If he wins again it is because a fraction vote pro life no matter how terrible the person

Another fraction vote low regulatory enforcement and taxes because it puts money into the trust fund, no matter how hideous the president.

And another fraction is terrified of the little brown people entering our country.


Yea buddy.
We heard this well articulated as the 'deplorables'.

While ever the 'left' in the US and across the world derides the genuine and decent intentions of hardworking people - you will lose out. Until of course demographics change sufficiently.

You are going to get smashed in the next election. You will need Texas to shift to win another election. Not happening this cycle.

A fraction have been brainwashed by the carnival barker and actually believe he is competent.

Still he loses.
Click to expand...
 
silesian said:
If he wins again it is because a fraction vote pro life no matter how terrible the person

Another fraction vote low regulatory enforcement and taxes because it puts money into the trust fund, no matter how hideous the president.

And another fraction is terrified of the little brown people entering our country. Instead of being horrified by racist birtherism and other bigotry, they embrace it.

A fraction have been brainwashed by the carnival barker and actually believe he is competent.

All that said, any other prez with this sort of economy would be in the 60 % approval and not 40s. So there are enough moral and decent Americans to vote this clown out of office.
Click to expand...

But which STATES disapprove of his performance?

Due to the EC, it’s not popular opinion but states that elects our presidents.

Trump realistically could lose the popular vote by wider margins than in 2016. He could lose it by 5-7 million yet if he wins certain key states (Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Ohio, Florida), then he’s in no matter what the population thinks. Keep in mind, Russian hacking and disinformation campaigns will be at their strongest targeting those states.
 
The EC and senate are interesting anti-Democratic instruments right now.

Our nation’s population is becoming more diverse, urban, educated, less religious, and more liberal. Yet, the key midwestern states (rust belt) where the EC gives the most advantage to, are becoming less diverse, older, whiter, less educated, more religious, and more conservative. Their children may grow up on a farm or in an decrepit industrial city, but once they leave home and go to college, they’re most likely to leave for a costal “liberal” city. The same could be said about the Senate. A state like Wyoming remains stagnant, its population demographics haven’t changed in the past 30 years nearly as much as a state like Arizona or California. Yet it still wields as much power in the senate as any other state.

Our democracy is experiencing a civil war as the two driving factors are moving in opposite directions. The increasing disconnect between people (popular opinion) and government (EC and Senate)
 
You need to make sure the cursor is below the quote...

Everyone else on this forum knows how this works.

Are you on drugs? Is that why you can't figure this out?
 

I see. You take everything literally.
Got it. I dont drink coffee. Literally never ever. I hate hot drinks. Havent done cocaine in a long time.


Sent from my iPad using JazzFanz mobile app
 
The Thriller said:
But which STATES disapprove of his performance?

Due to the EC, it’s not popular opinion but states that elects our presidents.

Trump realistically could lose the popular vote by wider margins than in 2016. He could lose it by 5-7 million yet if he wins certain key states (Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Ohio, Florida), then he’s in no matter what the population thinks. Keep in mind, Russian hacking and disinformation campaigns will be at their strongest targeting those states.
Click to expand...

Pretty strong recency bias.

If a candidate wins by 2.5% it is HIGHLY unlikely he loses the election. Trump's 2.1% vote loss is an outlier and even then a few 10,000 vote swings in rust belt, he loses.

Swing states only matter when elections are close. And swing states are highly correlated with national totals.

If Trump loses by more than 2.5% of the popular vote, he is toast. With his disapproval ratings, he is toast.
 
I am not on drugs I leave that up to you liberals. I love how you ignore Fision's post on using drugs, but you liberals always cover for each other.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top