Zombie
Well-Known Member
**** like that is why he gets lumped in with the rest of the dumpster fire that is the far/alt right.
Alex Jones and Social Media Censorship
- Thread starter Saint Cy of JFC
- Start date
**** like that is why he gets lumped in with the rest of the dumpster fire that is the far/alt right.
One Brow
Well-Known Member
The people on Gab like Gab just the way it is; they won't be moving anywhere. No, people never wear themselves out on stupid. Ample proof of that in this thread.
Many liberals (and many conservative) don't want to fix the posting on Gab, they just want to not have to deal with it.
Hotdog
Well-Known Member
Never heard of Gab til you mentioned it. Have you been on there before? Looks like you need to sign up to view it.
Funny how wikipedia gets to label sites like that far right and then lock down the page.
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
Love me some Rogan. Dude is pretty damn level headed.
Hotdog
Well-Known Member
The left labels him far right. He is about as center as you can get. That just goes to show how far the left has moved further to the left.
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
He says what he is in the video. I feel like I'm left of center as well. That said, dumb ****s on here lable me far right too because they're incapable of original thoughts and are sheepletons of the mob.
One Brow
Well-Known Member
the far-right is who Gab was created to be used by.
Hotdog
Well-Known Member
Does the website actually state this? Or are you sourcing it from one of the numerous leftist controlled websites?
Im a little skeptical these days of anyone labeling anything far right considering everything that doesnt align with Antifa is now far right.
One Brow
Well-Known Member
Notice any difference between the softball questions he offered to Ngo, whose answers he left unchallenged, versus the antagonistic, repetitive question of the Twitter representative? When you softball the guests on the right and hound the others, it undermines your claim to be on the left.
Very few people think of themselves as an extremist. Most of us consider our positions based on sound thinking. Most of us are wrong.
However, I think it's extra-ironic that, right after watching a Rogan video talking about how it's wrong to dehumanize Ngo and the Proud Boys, you do that very same dehumanization to the posters of this forum.
One Brow
Well-Known Member
You should be skeptical. Feel free to go judge for yourself.
I don't label you too far right. I label you as someone who can't fathom seeing it any other way than what you've decided it is. Left or Right, that's a problem.
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
People like you, Harambe, Thriller have claimed I'm far-right, a nazi sympathizer, white supremacist, racist, I read Breitbart/Fox, etc because of the example of extremism that is pointed out in that video. None of that is true. I like Ben Shapiro and disagree with many of his social issues. That seems to strike a nerve.
That **** is old, predictable, and shows you're on the fringe. If it makes it ironic that I point it out then, it's about as ironic as AM singing isn't it ironic? In other words, no, no it isn't.
That whole interview with Rogan was interesting and thought provoking. The falsehoods that are pushed by the left to support their narrative is absurd and dangerous. Same with the right.
Portland is out of ****ing control. The mayor should be ashamed of himself.
Last edited:
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
One of the things I pride myself in and I've said many times is I'm very capable of being wrong, seeing different perspectives, changing and evolving my own perspective.
Usually when I make a post to start a discussion, it triggers those of different opinions who then tell me what I think, why I think it and lable me as things I'm not.
It doesn't really matter what I think. How it is is what matters.
Spoken like someone who believes their view is "just the way it is", and less like someone who actually feels like they are "capable of being wrong".
There isn't a designed bias against one side or the other. Both sides get away with far too much ****, and when **** hits the fan, you come to the aid of proud boys whining about being censored when they clearly go beyond acceptable means(usually threats of physical violence, other times just breaking site rules).
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
Give me one example of how I've come to the aid of the proud boys. Give me one example of where I've said anything about the proud boys being censored.
I've repeatedly condemned them in this thread while you and others have sympathized for the mask wearing bitches called the antifa.
Again, you're blinded by your perspective and can't compute mine to the degree you have to make **** up about it.
Bitch move.
Sure. Here's the most obvious posts trying to paint an extreme right as getting an unfair shake.
And here's where you come up short again, you still haven't answered **** for questions.
Majority owner of Archie Moses said:
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
**** the proud boys. **** the antifa.
The point being made is not to sympathize for either group. It's to shut them both down if you're going to use rules.
The antifa just beat a journalist they've labeled as a far right sympathizer, a doxxer, and he must be shut down. He's none of those. He's a gay minority and he's doing his job. He's presented things the left doesn't want to hear so they beat him until his brain bleed and then blamed him.
Like Tim Pool says, if you're going to ban the Proud Boys, then by all means. Using the same standards, why not ban the antifa? The Twitter lawyer even agrees with it. It's a simple point being made. It, by no means, translates to white knighting. Shut down any groups that incites violence.
Show me where Antifa's gotten a free pass where proud boys didn't under the exact same circumstances.
Archie Moses
Well-Known Member
Tim Pool mentions a number of examples. They have fallen on deaf ears because of, well, bias.