What's new

2020 Presidential election

Don’t let facts get in the way of propaganda.

Speaking of propaganda - Bipartisan Senate Report: Obama Failed to Secure U.S. Election Systems, Trump Admin Making Progress. A bipartisan report by the Senate Intelligence Committee documents how the Obama administration did not take effective action as Russia worked to target the U.S. election process.
The same report shows that, under the Trump administration, U.S. agencies have made significant progress in working to secure election systems while vulnerabilities still remain. Hmmmm wonder why Obama sat back and let Russia interfere with the 2016 election, and President Trump is working to correct the problem. Haven't you socialist on here told us Trump wants Russia help. Another lie I guess.
 
Hmmmm wonder why Obama sat back and let Russia interfere with the 2016 election

Well, that statement is a little disingenuous. I've mentioned this more then once. It's part of the history, and should not be overlooked when considering the history leading up to the 2016 election. Apart from the fact that before the 2016 election, Obama told Putin to his face at the G20 summit to knock it off, while just recently, Trump joked with Putin about Russian interference, quite the difference between the two men in how they viewed a Russian attack on our nation, we should not forget Mitch McConnell's role in scuttling efforts to denounce what Russia was doing, and his doing so prior to the 2016 election. Obama wanted a joint declaration from Congress condemning Russian interference. McConnell refused to go along with that plan.

https://www.kentucky.com/opinion/editorials/article120718538.html

"Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell should explain why he blocked a bipartisan denunciation of Russian interference in our election before voters went to the polls.
Americans deserve to hear why McConnell did not trust them with the evidence that he and 11 other congressional leaders received in a confidential briefing in September.

The Washington Post reports that during that briefing McConnell “made clear to the administration that he would consider any effort by the White House to challenge the Russians publicly an act of partisan politics.”

McConnell also questioned the veracity of the intelligence, according to the Post......."

A friendly greeting at the Sept. 5, 2016 summit:

ap_16249265073116obamaputin_custom-08378be206731e711b46743591a68ba848335a58-s1100-c15.jpg
 
Last edited:
Speaking of propaganda - Bipartisan Senate Report: Obama Failed to Secure U.S. Election Systems, Trump Admin Making Progress. A bipartisan report by the Senate Intelligence Committee documents how the Obama administration did not take effective action as Russia worked to target the U.S. election process.
The same report shows that, under the Trump administration, U.S. agencies have made significant progress in working to secure election systems while vulnerabilities still remain. Hmmmm wonder why Obama sat back and let Russia interfere with the 2016 election, and President Trump is working to correct the problem. Haven't you socialist on here told us Trump wants Russia help. Another lie I guess.

You are blaming Obama for Russian interference that never happened?
 
I think Warren and Harris have the best chances of beating him. It all depends on if they can get conservative voters that won't vote for trump to pull the lever for them.
Not a chance, they are to far left, full blown socialist left. Conservatives can't do it despite of what they think of Trump.

Sent from my Moto Z (2) using JazzFanz mobile app
 
My two cents is that it will likely come down to Sanders, Warren, and Harris.

Warren would be my pick of the three, but each of them would have a good chance of beating the racist ***** grabber.
So it's only racist if he tweets about or calls out someone who is other than white, got it.

Sent from my Moto Z (2) using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Well she is known as the starter of the birther issue.

So, you think Trump/Fox News were following Clinton's order for 8 years, or just that they were not smart enough to have thought that up on their own? Because otherwise, why is that relevant?
 
Want to discuss how much of our uranium Hillary sold to the Russians?

I'll start. It was 0 in any unit you choose to name, so let's go with 0 grams. Now, what would you like to discuss about that?

BTW, in case you were not aware, Russia has about 9 times more of the amount of unmined uranium than the US. It's not like they would need ours.
 
Back
Top