The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

[fishonjazz]

What negative things did I say? What parts were wrong? Everything I said is 100% factual.

I didn't say it was incorrect. You are confused again.
Negative things can be true. (I'm shocked I had to explain that to someone)

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[JazzyFresh]

I didn't say it was incorrect. You are confused again.
Negative things can be true. (I'm shocked I had to explain that to someone)

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

I was only making the point that corruption in the White House has been prevalent since I've been able to digest politics.

 

[fishonjazz]

I was only making the point that corruption in the White House has been prevalent since I've been able to digest politics.

Cool. I don't think anyone thinks otherwise.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[lauriandres]

As for you acting like Democrats can only beat him this way and not in a fair election lol at that. You claim to be about both sides right? Well maybe get off your high horse and point out that Trump seems to need Russia, ukraine, and China to beat his opponents in an election.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

Why would a random American believe Russian or Chinese "facts"?
I know that in general Russia and China have plenty of resources to fabricate any evidence a la Fishonjazz caused the disappearance of the flight MH370 , but are there really that huge amount of Americans who believe propaganda or fake evidence created by China or Russia and cannot distinguish whether some situation is true or not? Yes, when i was 10 year old, then i also believed that Soviet troops did not do anything bad in my country (according to history books at school - of course, my parents kept low profile to not have any troubles at work - basically every company at Soviet union had at least one KGB member), but now in modern times those who have graduated at least high school should not require that much of studying to verify whether some situation is true or not.
If the opponents are all good i.e have not done anything illegal, why they just do not shout - "hey, corners and diagonals are already covered in BS Bingo style" and just laugh and concentrating their skills to find (like in chess) not a good but even better move to win the elections?

 

[JazzyFresh]

Cool. I don't think anyone thinks otherwise.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

Cool. I don't think anyone thinks otherwise.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

No biggie that potus is surrounded by criminals. I guess. You’d be wetting your diapers if Obama did 1% of what trump has done.

It was in response to this. And no I didn't lose my ****. As I said corruption at the highest level isn't anything new. What confuses me is why it only matters on the party affiliation to most. Obama spying on Trump is no better or worse than Trump asking Ukraine to investigate Hunter. Bush in my eyes is one of the biggest war criminals in recent history.

Again people are picking and choosing. As I said last night, if we want to drain the swamp, let's drain it. But I'll never get behind doing it to gain a political edge. The swamp is alive and well on both sides. I bet if we looked hard enough we could impeach most, if not all, higher positions in our government.

 

[fishonjazz]

Why would a random American believe Russian or Chinese "facts"?
I know that in general Russia and China have plenty of resources to fabricate any evidence a la Fishonjazz caused the disappearance of the flight MH370 , but are there really that huge amount of Americans who believe propaganda or fake evidence created by China or Russia and cannot distinguish whether some situation is true or not? Yes, when i was 10 year old, then i also believed that Soviet troops did not do anything bad in my country (according to history books at school - of course, my parents kept low profile to not have any troubles at work - basically every company at Soviet union had at least one KGB member), but now in modern times those who have graduated at least high school should not require that much of studying to verify whether some situation is true or not.
If the opponents are all good i.e have not done anything illegal, why they just do not shout - "hey, corners and diagonals are already covered in BS Bingo style" and just laugh and concentrating their skills to find (like in chess) not a good but even better move to win the elections?

No idea what this post means.
Trump has tried to get other countries to provide dirt on his competition. That's my post.
Do you have something to respond to that about?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[Harambe]

Oh, you mean like this adult?

https://ijr.com/aoc-gop-challenger-runs-away/

No, it's a little different. Where AOC was not prepared for a debate where her challengers were, she knew there wasn't a fair playing field. @JazzyFresh on the other hand, has been at it for days now, and should be very well prepared that this point. And he's trying his damndest to push the spotlight any other way than A politicized deviation of funds leveraged to gain dirt on a political rival.

He won't accept that there are many spotlights. And foreign interests getting involved in our democratic process is simply the brightest. People pick the low hanging fruit because it's low hanging. And if it tastes just as sweet as the fruit at the top, why bother? There will be others to get that.

Instead, he pusses out, and pretends he doesn't know what my question is, even though I ended four different posts asking the same damn thing. "What would it take for you to consider an investigation is needed?" We only got vague, half-assed answers out of him.

Little does he even consider evidence found in an impeachment investigation may warrant Biden's arrest. But he's too busy crying, bitching, and moaning to think it through.

Reminds me a lot of you, actually. Just slightly less annoying, and a little bit more thoughtful

 

[Harambe]

As I said angry angry

That's cool though, you're ok in my eyes. I don't think anything negative about you or any of you. I honest to God have no clue what you're asking but at this point your complete lack of respect makes me not care. We all have a difference of opinion and sometimes we get fired up but I don't see any of you as cowards and i know I have overstepped myself so I apologize and take responsibility(fishon). I'm a better human and far more mature than calling someone I don't know a coward or dumb because of anger issues. It doesn't get me off like it does some of you. Bullyism is terrible, very Trump like.

Have a good day and go Jazz wooooo!!!

Awh, still running away. Cute.

 

[fishonjazz]

It was in response to this. And no I didn't lose my ****. As I said corruption at the highest level isn't anything new. What confuses me is why it only matters on the party affiliation to most. Obama spying on Trump is no better or worse than Trump asking Ukraine to investigate Hunter. Bush in my eyes is one of the biggest war criminals in recent history.

Again people are picking and choosing. As I said last night, if we want to drain the swamp, let's drain it. But I'll never get behind doing it to gain a political edge. The swamp is alive and well on both sides. I bet if we looked hard enough we could impeach most, if not all, higher positions in our government.

The difference between whatever Obama did and whatever Trump did is that what did (or is accused of doing) is impeachable and the government that we elected have decided to start an impeachment inquiry.

So that's where we are. Maybe you don't think presidents should be able to be impeached because they are all crooked. Idk.
Fact is that Trump has an impeachment inquiry going on. Obama didn't. Obama is in the past. What is happening with Trump is in the present and it's being discussed.

It's big time news. It's being discussed like crazy all over the place by conservatives and liberals and everyone else.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

 

[Harambe]

Brah, you ever been in a relationship?

Smoke a doobie, dude.

Sounds like you. Run away from your problems, rely on some figurehead as vaguely supports your opinion, smoke a joint, and wake up in the morning.

I am glad you've found something to cool your jets though.

 

[Harambe]

The saving grace of Joe Rogan.

Battin' 1.000

 

[Harambe]

We voted to impeach him yet?

Didn't think so. All this "damning" evidence but no backbone.

Are you even vaguely aware of the process here? You gather evidence to support a case. We're not at the level of impeachment, just the inquiry.