What's new
By:
Filters

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

I repeat...

",I saidI’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars. I said, you’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money."
 
I mean are we becoming insane? Is this country becoming insane, taking the words of a family who has ties to the biggest pedophile in history seriously. Same goes for Trumpers. I must be in the twilight zone.
 
Jazzta said:
Lol, truly a “politifact”. Dude I like you in basketball forums but I have 0 tolerance for Clinton apologists.
Click to expand...
I'm hardly a Clinton apologist. I just prefer criticisms with a factual basis. There's plenty not to like about her without making stuff up.
 
JazzyFresh said:
Lies like Schifty when he made up a completely bogus transcript? Or when he lied that he hadn't met the whistleblower?
Click to expand...

Schiff paraphrased the transcript, and did not claim it was an exact reading. Schiff did not meet the informant, his staff did.

Why are repeating the lies of other people, again? Even when you try to claim others are lying, you still repeat lies to do so.
 
One Brow said:
Schiff paraphrased the transcript, and did not claim it was an exact reading. Schiff did not meet the informant, his staff did.

Why are repeating the lies of other people, again? Even when you try to claim others are lying, you still repeat lies to do so.
Click to expand...
Lol paraphrasing is completely acceptable and a joke when talking about impeaching the highest positive in the nation. Completely acceptable. Its just show how this is a joke to you people.

How am I lying? Schifty lied that they hadn't met with the Whistleblower but he did. This is well known. From your darling CNN

We have not spoken directly with the whistleblower," he said. "We would like to, but I'm sure the whistleblower has concerns, that he has not been advised, as the law requires, by the inspector general or the director of national intelligence just as to how he is to communicate with Congress."

Following reports that aides in Schiff's House Intelligence Committee did have contact with the whistleblower, Schiff has faced a barrage of criticism from those claiming he was less than honest in his answer. President Donald Trump has also argued that this contact was illegal.
 
JazzyFresh said:
Lol paraphrasing is completely acceptable and a joke when talking about impeaching the highest positive in the nation. Completely acceptable. Its just show how this is a joke to you people.
Click to expand...

Thank you for acknowledging that you were repeating a lie. As for impeachment being a joke, no one is impeaching Trump based on Schiff's paraphrasing. That's just a distraction.

JazzyFresh said:
How am I lying?
Click to expand...

I did not claim you were lying. I don't know if you are or not.

JazzyFresh said:
Schifty lied that they hadn't met with the Whistleblower but he did. This is well known. From your darling CNN

We have not spoken directly with the whistleblower," he said. "We would like to, but I'm sure the whistleblower has concerns, that he has not been advised, as the law requires, by the inspector general or the director of national intelligence just as to how he is to communicate with Congress."
Click to expand...

"We", the members of the committee, had not spoken to the WB at that point.

JazzyFresh said:
Following reports that aides in Schiff's House Intelligence Committee did have contact with the whistleblower, Schiff has faced a barrage of criticism from those claiming he was less than honest in his answer. President Donald Trump has also argued that this contact was illegal.
Click to expand...

Schiff did indeed face a barrage of criticism.

Does this mean Trump is innocent, to you? Should he be exonerated because Schiff did not say his staff had met the WB? If not, what is your point here?
 
One Brow said:
Thank you for acknowledging that you were repeating a lie. As for impeachment being a joke, no one is impeaching Trump based on Schiff's paraphrasing. That's just a distraction.



I did not claim you were lying. I don't know if you are or not.



"We", the members of the committee, had not spoken to the WB at that point.



Schiff did indeed face a barrage of criticism.

Does this mean Trump is innocent, to you? Should he be exonerated because Schiff did not say his staff had met the WB? If not, what is your point here?
Click to expand...
Trump did not say or do what Schifty paraphrased. Paraphrasing or not, it is NOT what Trump did Personally when I and everyone paraphrases you do so on the basis of accuracy not making up lies that never happened. The stuff he paraphrased was a lie.
 
Its crazy how some of you guys don't understand basic vocabulary. Who the heck are you to change the dictionary and meaning.

Lie

1: to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive


Schifty made an untrue statement. He made it to deceive. He lied.
 
JazzyFresh said:
You do know what a coup is right. It is overthrowing the government. Lol.
Click to expand...

every four years we have a coup in the USA. Apparently.

Y’all are wasting time with this guy.

he thinks exercising constitutional processes is a coup.
 
JazzyFresh said:
Trump did not say or do what Schifty paraphrased. Paraphrasing or not, it is NOT what Trump did
Click to expand...

We have the testimony of multiple Trump appointees that Schiff's paraphrase was exactly was Trump did. Why don't you believe Trump's hand-picked people on this?
 
One Brow said:
If you can come up with a reason why it is relevant, we can discuss it.
Click to expand...

Well obviously this impeachment has been planned from the start which makes every point any of you make about it invalid.

Unless you can prove that Dems have a crystal ball.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Top