What's new
By:

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread



It's hilarious that the actual guy that committed Quid Pro Quo is now front runner of the Democratic Party. He even implicates Obama.

Not a word from you hypocrites. It's plain as day lol. Way more evidence than anything you hypocrites have on Trump.

"But somebody heard something from someone else."

How ****ing stupid. Democrats know how stupid and use this against their own.
 
JazzyFresh said:


It's hilarious that the actual guy that committed Quid Pro Quo is now front runner of the Democratic Party. He even implicates Obama.

Not a word from you hypocrites. It's plain as day lol. Way more evidence than anything you hypocrites have on Trump.

"But somebody heard something from someone else."

How ****ing stupid. Democrats know how stupid and use this against their own.
Click to expand...


But you know, Joe Biden admitting to this isn’t proof of anything. Agreed about the hypocrisy.
 
"I do not know the identity of the whistleblower"



Last Wednesday, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), chaired by Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, published the unredacted name of a man alleged to be the so-called whistleblower who helped launch impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump.


The whistleblower who filed a complaint about President Trump did not tell Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson about his or her contact with House Intelligence Committee staff, the watchdog told lawmakers on Friday.
 
JazzyFresh said:
"I do not know the identity of the whistleblower"



Last Wednesday, the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (HPSCI), chaired by Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, published the unredacted name of a man alleged to be the so-called whistleblower who helped launch impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump.


The whistleblower who filed a complaint about President Trump did not tell Intelligence Community Inspector General Michael Atkinson about his or her contact with House Intelligence Committee staff, the watchdog told lawmakers on Friday.
Click to expand...

Don’t bother, it’s all over man. Lol
 
My fav part so far is reading the different "News" outlets reporting on this crap., Each organization taking their side and putting up their barriers. I love this stuff! It's the best reality TV. About as legit as reality TV as well.
 
JazzyFresh said:
I think it's pretty damn important to be able to question the person responsible for this entire thing. Especially when they have specific interest and lawyers that have been speaking of overthrowing the government. The whistleblower is direct evidence. The whistleblower IS the evidence. I think it's completely logical thing to ask for.
Click to expand...

If you are investigating the cause of a fire, do you interview the person who reported smoke or the person who saw the arsonist pouring gasoline and starting the fire?
 
silesian said:
If you are investigating the cause of a fire, do you interview the person who reported smoke or the person who saw the arsonist pouring gasoline and starting the fire?
Click to expand...
If there's no fire, 100%. There is no gasoline here. We must figure out why said person lied and said there was gasoline. Especially if the person that made the claim had special interest.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top