What's new
By:

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

JazzyFresh said:
Yeah insults are a sure sign of intelligence. The inability to conversate without them...

So explain. How does Sonland know there is Quid Pro Quo when he openly admits that he had no clue what Trump wanted and it's nothing more than a presumption?

Its pretty straight forward...
Click to expand...

Good insults are a sign of intelligence. Insults, on their own, aren't really related to intelligence at all to be clear. Inability to understand details and small events in the context of the aggregate are definitely a sign of lack of intelligence. You make your own conclusions.

I think at this point there's no amount of explaining to be done in your direction. Either you make an effort to listen in and respond in good faith or you shouldn't expect much. You keep accusing everybody else here of crazy ****, hypocritically. Everyone here engages in that here and there but you take it to the next level though. It'd be nice to see a good back and forth with points conceded, unfortunately that whole intelligence thing keeps getting in the way.

Nah,

Just keep yelling at everyone here for that paper with big red letters (written in blood, probably) that state "I, Donald Trump, am engaging in a QUID PRO QUO with you, President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine. Investigate my political Rival's son, HUNTER BIDEN, so I can beat him in an American Election. In exchange, I will give you all that defense money, that you should have gotten weeks ago."
 
JazzyFresh said:
Ditto. The conservative, alt-left, Marxist.
Click to expand...


You might as well be calling me a manatee.

you have been well trained by trump propaganda. lie over and over and over again. And you will find some low iq gullible people to believe you.

Vlad loves you, keep up the good work for the motherland, comrade.
 
Safetydan said:
Good insults are a sign of intelligence. Insults, on their own, aren't really related to intelligence at all to be clear. Inability to understand details and small events in the context of the aggregate are definitely a sign of lack of intelligence. You make your own conclusions.

I think at this point there's no amount of explaining to be done in your direction. Either you make an effort to listen in and respond in good faith or you shouldn't expect much. You keep accusing everybody else here of crazy ****, hypocritically. Everyone here engages in that here and there but you take it to the next level though. It'd be nice to see a good back and forth with points conceded, unfortunately that whole intelligence thing keeps getting in the way.

Nah,

Just keep yelling at everyone here for that paper with big red letters (written in blood, probably) that state "I, Donald Trump, am engaging in a QUID PRO QUO with you, President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine. Investigate my political Rival's son, HUNTER BIDEN, so I can beat him in an American Election. In exchange, I will give you all that defense money, that you should have gotten weeks ago."
Click to expand...
Lol good old self projection and hearsay.
 
JazzyFresh said:
Find me where in the transcripts Quid Pro Quo happened...

I've provided 5 witnesses who said it didn't.
Click to expand...

People who did not witness something are not witnesses. They are irrelevant bystanders. You are trying to prove a negative, a fools errand.

Along those lines there are billions of people who did not witness the Charles Manson murders.
 
Safetydan said:
Just keep yelling at everyone here for that paper with big red letters (written in blood, probably) that state "I, Donald Trump, am engaging in a QUID PRO QUO with you, President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine. Investigate my political Rival's son, HUNTER BIDEN, so I can beat him in an American Election. In exchange, I will give you all that defense money, that you should have gotten weeks ago."
Click to expand...
It doesn't exist and you know it. You cant prove me wrong so get angry. Real angry.
 
JazzyFresh said:
And not a word... Proof that you guys don't give a damn about corruption. Not even a thought. More evidence that I'm right and you are wrong. I even quoted your Godly news source that you conveniently don't want to talk about...
Click to expand...

Keep amassing your imaginary evidence. you'll change minds soon. LOL. Corruption? You clearly don't agree but that's exactly what we're supporting and advocating for in the impeachment inquiry. If you, like us, thought that Donald Trump may have done something, as an advocate for anti-corruption, you'd also be in support of this process.
 
silesian said:
People who did not witness something are not witnesses. They are irrelevant bystanders. You are trying to prove a negative, a fools errand.

Along those lines there are billions of people who did not witness the Charles Manson murders.
Click to expand...
Agree. You are the ones trying to impeach off of bystanders accounts. We have the transcript. What you have is second and third hand accounts.
 
Safetydan said:
Keep amassing your imaginary evidence. you'll change minds soon. LOL. Corruption? You clearly don't agree but that's exactly what we're supporting and advocating for in the impeachment inquiry. If you, like us, thought that Donald Trump may have done something, as an advocate for anti-corruption, you'd also be in support of this process.
Click to expand...
Angry and still not a word

Corruption though

And I don't care. I've stated that politicians are crooked on both parties numerous times. Its you who looks past one and cares about the other
 
JazzyFresh said:
Lol good old self projection and hearsay.
Click to expand...

Words are difficult. huh?


JazzyFresh said:
It doesn't exist and you know it. You cant prove me wrong so get angry. Real angry.
Click to expand...

I don't know that it doesn't exist.

There are two possible scenarios here:

1. It does exist in some form Or maybe some other type of damning evidence : Why on earth would Donald Trump and guilty parties allow this to get in the hands of anybody? In this instance

2. It doesn't exist : There should be evidence of its non-existence no? Seems like the white house would want to release all of his call transcripts and other records verbatim to prove that no foul play exists. Boldly clear your name Mr. President go ahead.

Non-cooperation on the part of the White House points to number 1. Just my thoughts here.
 
JazzyFresh said:
Angry and still not a word

Corruption though

And I don't care. I've stated that politicians are crooked on both parties numerous times. Its you who looks past one and cares about the other
Click to expand...

Oh so its you who doesn't care about corruption. Nice

I'd like to see an investigation launched for all credible corruption allegations. I'm being honest here. I really don't like corruption. You think if all corruption is not investigated, none of it should be. That seems weird, and pretty unwise. I think expecting perfection in that sense might be a little unrealistic.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page
Back
Top