The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

[Safetydan]

Agree. You are the ones trying to impeach off of bystanders accounts. We have the transcript. What you have is second and third hand accounts.

It's called an inquiry for a reason. Trying to gather evidence and make a decision on whether an impeachment is appropriate is what is happening.

 

[silesian]

Agree. You are the ones trying to impeach off of bystanders accounts. We have the transcript. What you have is second and third hand accounts.

You are arguing for innocence based on testimony from people who were not at the crime scene.

 

[JazzyFresh]

I don't know that it doesn't exist.


.

Exactly

 

[One Brow]

Yeah you're totally neutral. You're the one who's been taking part in a "Let's Impeach Trump" thread before any of this even happened. Lol definitely no ulterior motive behind you and all others...

I don't claim to be neutral, that's your pretense.

 

[JazzyFresh]

You are arguing for innocence based on testimony from people who were not at the crime scene.

You are arguing there's a crime scene when we have the actual call.

 

[One Brow]

It wasn't an insult. I was actually right that you wouldn't say a word about corruption against your own party. You're so quick to call it out against Trump but when an FBI agent allegedly lied to get the FISA warrant you don't say a word. It just shows you don't give a single damn about corruption. You don't...

If an FBI (agent? lawyer? both?) lied, they should be punished just as harshly as we punish any other police officer/prosecutor for lying or making misleading statements. Heck, let's go even further and fine the guy a couple of dollars.

However, unless the FBI person received a personal benefit, that's not corruption.

 

[idestroyedthetoilet]

But his testimony strikes me as someone 100% covering his own ***--

I got the same impression. I don't know what exactly he's covering up but he sure as hell acted like someone who is trying to weasel out of a bad situation before getting caught. I was going to mention that we'll probably see a Sondland investigation somewhere down the road.

Now I have to listen to his opening monologue again, because it sounded very damning the first go round.

 

[idestroyedthetoilet]

OJ told us he was not the murderer.

You are a ****ing wierd dude. Is there a reason you quote me and post random **** afterward? Your forum conversation style reminds me A LOT like the people who frequented the conspiracy forums I used to read as a hobby. Very distinct mannerisms.

Oddball.

 

[silesian]

You are arguing there's a crime scene when we have the actual call.

No one is arguing that the call was the totality of the problem, but I give you credit, you are fixated.

 

[JazzyFresh]

No one is arguing that the call was the totality of the problem, but I give you credit, you are fixated.

That's the entire basis of this investigation. Entire basis.

 

[Safetydan]

Exactly

That's all you have to say? You didn't read past that line? If you can't respond to the full post, much less with a measure of understanding and consideration, You don't deserve anybody's time. It's like talking to a child

 

[JazzyFresh]

You guys have completely moved the goal post. Just like Russia.