What's new

The official "let's impeach Trump" thread

Oh sweet more advice from another person who lives in fantasy land.

The electoral college is there for a reason. Please educate yourself on mob rule and refrain from spouting nonsense. One lost election from the Democrats doesn't mean its broke. Hillary Clinton is the worst presidential candidate in our lifetime. Thats why she lost. She lost to one of the most unelectable people ever. Thats on her, and the Democrats for not having enough backbone to fight off the Clintons. You let her rig the primaries.
Lol at you thinking Hillary is the only candidate to win the popular vote and lose the electoral college vote.
Educate yourself.

I have no control over the primaries being rigged or not. Educate yourself.

Stephen King is a person. Not a mob. Educate yourself.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Lol at you thinking Hillary is the only candidate to win the popular vote and lose the electoral college vote.
Educate yourself.

I have no control over the primaries being rigged or not. Educate yourself.

Stephen King is a person. Not a mob. Educate yourself.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

If what you got out of that is I said Stephen King is a mob. Or that Hillary Clinton is the only person to win the popular vote and lose the electoral college, then you really dont have any reading comprehension skills.
 
If what you got out of that is I said Stephen King is a mob. Or that Hillary Clinton is the only person to win the popular vote and lose the electoral college, then you really dont have any reading comprehension skills.
Lol. You don't know how to write.
You said ONE lost election doesn't mean it's broke. There has been more than 1.
You said I was following a mob. I only pasted an SK tweet.
Educate yourself

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
What is an MSM site?
Feel free to step away from the ledge if this is all too much for you.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app

LOL. This is a good post.

I'd like to add that from what I gather, MSM news sites are sites that typically don't spout racism and regurgitate Russian propaganda. Hence, why only a handful of trolls here seem to live in non-MSM news sites.
 
Last edited:
I don't notice any of the zealous supporters of Impeach Trump going bat **** insane that Biden will refuse to testify to the Senate. Where are all those with empty claims of caring for the rule of law? It's not Trump, doesn't matter.
 
I don't notice any of the zealous supporters of Impeach Trump going bat **** insane that Biden will refuse to testify to the Senate. Where are all those with empty claims of caring for the rule of law? It's not Trump, doesn't matter.
If you start a thread about Biden not testifying before the Senate then I promise I will go into that thread and post my displeasure.
Hopefully you will be satiated.

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
I don't notice any of the zealous supporters of Impeach Trump going bat **** insane that Biden will refuse to testify to the Senate. Where are all those with empty claims of caring for the rule of law? It's not Trump, doesn't matter.

I do. I'm sorry you haven't seen that yet.

What are the odds you just don't want to see that yet?
 
I’m just curious, what do repubs hope to get out of asking the Bidens to testify? Which Bidens btw?

Hunter was a lawyer who sat on the board of a company. Do they hope he’ll admit to crimes committed by this company that he helped to bury? Which crimes do repubs think this company committed?

Joe is an even stranger case, do republicans hope he’ll admit that all the international support in firing that corrupt investigator was fake? Do they hope that his testimony will reveal that the firing of that investigator was beneficial to his family and not to the west’s anti-corruption interests?

I don’t think the right has thought this through. Seems like they are calling the Bidens to testify in a gag reflex, because everyone is calling for members of the trump administration to testify. It’s just another form of both sidesism that is so prevalent in today’s culture.
 
I don't notice any of the zealous supporters of Impeach Trump going bat **** insane that Biden will refuse to testify to the Senate. Where are all those with empty claims of caring for the rule of law? It's not Trump, doesn't matter.

Sounds like bluster to me. If the Senate subpoenas him, he'll show up.

That said, do you think Biden is wrong that his testimony will be distraction, as opposed to having legitimate evidence?
 
Let’s hypothesize for a second that the Republican best dream is true:

1. Burisma: Admits to being the world’s most corrupt company by funding pro choice groups, organizing gun control rallies, and laundering George Soros money to Black Lives Matter.

2. Hunter Biden: Admits to never graduating from law school and accepting a job at Burisma strictly to trigger the right... And being way dumber than Don JR.

3. Joe Biden: Admits that he couldn’t win in a fist fight against Trump because Trump is in even better shape than Rocky in Rocky 4. And that he pressured the international community to fire the corrupt Ukrainian prosecutor strictly to help his son.

4. Crowdstrike: Lets pretend a Ukrainian man finds in a warehouse a white box marked CROWDSTRIKE: DNC SERVER. And it’s loaded with thousands of Hillary Clinton’s emails. These emails detail how she killed Vince Foster and Seth Rich, planned the Benghazi attack, and was going to use her presidency to load all 80+ year old Fox News viewers into concentration camps.

Even then, wouldn't Trump’s actions still be impeachable?

I. A president can’t hold up money allocated by congress if congress hasn't specifically added stipulations to those funds, right?

II. A president can’t bypass his entire state department and send his personal lawyer to conduct shadow diplomacy, right?

III. A president can’t blackmail a foreign leader to interfere in our elections, right? Even if such investigations are warranted, the firing of ambassadors and smearing their reputations to enable interference into our elections using foreign aid is still impeachable, right?

IV. The president can’t obstruct an investigation into his actions, like he’s done, right? I mean, if congress can’t arrest him because he must first be impeached, then certainly congress needs to be able to investigate him cleanly and without obstruction to determine whether impeachment is warranted, right?

Are republicans really ready to set this precedent? What happens when President Warren commits these same acts in 2023? Will republicans empower her with monarchial powers because of the precedent they’ve set with Trump?

If I’m wrong then someone explain using facts that I’m wrong. But it seems to me that no matter how you slice it, Trump has abused his office to the point that he needs to be impeached. Otherwise, the precedent set essentially eliminates impeachment from the presidency and gives the president complete power and immunity to do what he or she wants. An absolute monarchy, is that really what the founders envisioned?
 
Last edited:
I was thinking Global Thermonuclear War, but I'm down for whatever.

EDIT: I misremembered the line. I edited my post to say "Shall we play a game?"
 
Last edited:
I don't notice any of the zealous supporters of Impeach Trump going bat **** insane that Biden will refuse to testify to the Senate. Where are all those with empty claims of caring for the rule of law? It's not Trump, doesn't matter.
Even if Biden is 100% corrupt and pushed Ukraine to get rid of Shokin for personal reasons it has nothing to do with Trump withholding funds for an ANNOUNCEMENT that Biden was being investigated in Ukraine.

So his testimony is irrelevant.

If Barr wants to launch a distraction, I mean investigation, into Biden then he can make himself look as stupid as he wants to look after his flopped investigations into the Muller investigation.
 
Today I learned (I know, wrong thread) that when Trump uses the word "us" he is actually saying United States.
Lol at his latest defense attempt.



Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
Apart from the impeachment proceedings, Trump has been litigating for months against virtually all demands for documents and information related to various types of potential presidential misconduct. Trump has also suffered a remarkable series of courtroom losses, often accompanied by emphatic judicial repudiations of his typically weak and overreaching arguments, and the lower court losses are now piling up before the Supreme Court.

Based on his past work as a member of Ken Starr’s team during the investigation of Bill Clinton, it is clear that Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh would emphatically disagree with Trump’s efforts to benefit from this obstruction of Congress.

Starr assigned Kavanaugh to play a key role in authoring Starr’s report to Congress, which included a section setting forth potential bases for impeaching the president; among them was a claim that Clinton should be impeached for going to court to assert the executive privilege in the first place. According to Starr and Kavanaugh, the privilege assertion was itself impeachable, because it was purportedly meritless and Clinton had managed to use the privilege litigation to delay Starr’s investigation. As the Starr Report put it, the temporary delay amounted to an illicit “conceal[ment]” by Clinton of his “personal misconduct.” Starr and Kavanaugh also argued that Clinton should be impeached because he refused to voluntarily testify himself, despite the fact that (unlike Trump) Clinton ultimately testified after receiving a subpoena; once again, mere delay was deemed potentially impeachable.

Clinton voluntarily dropped his litigation challenges, thus allowing Starr to obtain the evidence he sought in more than sufficient time to complete his report. All of the relevant evidence was ultimately made available to Congress in connection with its impeachment inquiry. By contrast, Trump has managed to employ litigation—and outright obstinacy—to keep potentially important documents and witnesses relating to the Ukraine investigation wholly out of the hands of Congress. Furthermore, Trump has gone to court in an effort to prevent Congress from reviewing the testimony and documents underlying Robert Mueller’s investigation as well.

It is not hard to imagine what a young Brett Kavanaugh would say about Trump’s bad-faith use of the courts to stonewall Congress’ investigation. He would say it amounts to “unlawful” presidential obstruction of Congress.


Lots of obstruction going on

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
 
What, you don't use Google?
What is an unmainstream media site and why should I frequent it?

You seem to like to watch mainstream basketball (NBA). You fool! You should be watching the Shri Lankan league if you want the real accurate and best basketball

Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Because basketball is relevant to how the country is run. Easy man, anything that’s not part of the major news networks is a good start. I see a lot of references to CNN and MSNBC on this thread, as deceiving and disrespectful as they are. Any other lame attempt at making an argument?

You used to be more independent thinking, at least that’s the impression that I had. The neolib virus truly appears to be very contagious.
 
Top