Some people voted for this buffoon
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/wor...tack-iran-to-be-re-elected-1.4129626?mode=amp
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/wor...tack-iran-to-be-re-elected-1.4129626?mode=amp
I think the misallocation is to programs that create weapons of war, especially wars which for the most part have been instigated by the U.S. for the purpose of feeding the MIC. And there's plenty of historical evidence to support that. I posted a link to an article that touched on this that I wrote about four years or so ago. It's probably more radical than most of the posters here, but then I don't pretend to be conservative.You made a typical Randian misallocation statement without accounting for any indirect benefits. To a Randian, we might as well get rid of all programs like social security and unemployment benefits because they are first, foremost, and forever a wasted misallocation tax, and to hell with all the indirect benefit provided to the taxpayer. Ut either does not exist to them, or they aren't capable of expanding their view beyond the initial tax.
These programs create a whole lot of smoothing dynamism. They're stabilizers. But in the view you gave us they are nothing more than a tax burden that leads to misallocation.
Not a cult... not at all...
This is both true and also misleading. The MIC creates jobs because taxpayers invest trillions into the MIC programs. If you did not tax people to build the MIC that money can remain in the private sector and create jobs more efficiently than the government can.
Ps: I worked in the MIC for 11 years
Remember members here telling us it was Trump who blew a hole in that ship in The Straight of Hormuz, just like Khamenei said?
That was from NYE at Trump's? Looks like fake people like Trump. These are 60-year-old women trying to look like 30-year-old babes. I wonder how much plastic surgery they have had.
Or, you could invest that in government infrastructure and a social safety net, and create jobs still more efficiently.
I only spent 6 years in the MIC.
Not a cult... not at all...
Obama? He's talking about Trump. And what he is saying is absolute lunacy. And if you agree, you have lost it too. God help you.Disgusting. Why can't this guy reserve his worship for Obama like ordinary media members?
You mean like every single time something happens in Iran the democrats go running to their Ayatollah for their talking points? Remember members here telling us it was Trump who blew a hole in that ship in The Straight of Hormuz, just like Khamenei said?
At least the Ukraine conspiracy has some meat to it, like Fusion GPS, all the oligarch funding, Peter Schiff's staffers planting the quid pro quo seed, the doctored, still unproven "black ledger", and on and on.
Link of the media saying that Obama isn't just a mere mortal?Disgusting. Why can't this guy reserve his worship for Obama like ordinary media members?
Are you serious? How many would you like?Link of the media saying that Obama isn't just a mere mortal?
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using JazzFanz mobile app
Who cares about Obama. Just a flunky for Wall Street. He fooled the media, that's for sure, and a lot of other people too.Are you serious? How many would you like?
https://www.washingtontimes.com/new...Uir_fsKsB67aktA49NYl12TXuIeJrTYRoCsnIQAvD_BwE
(You're only getting one because I have an early plane to catch, but these are easy to find. You really are serious when you say you don't pay attention to politics, aren't you.)
Poor example.Are you serious? How many would you like?
https://www.washingtontimes.com/new...Uir_fsKsB67aktA49NYl12TXuIeJrTYRoCsnIQAvD_BwE
(You're only getting one because I have an early plane to catch, but these are easy to find. You really are serious when you say you don't pay attention to politics, aren't you.)