JimLes
Well-Known Member
my thing is I’ve always had positive experiences.
These are not at all positive experiences. The outcome might have been positive for you and your interests, but these are decidedly negative experiences. Both of these cops abused power, just like the one in Fish's story. The only difference is that you liked being let off the hook while he obviously didn't like being roughed up.
The real issue here is that police officers are supposed to be part of the executive branch, but have been usurping powers of the other two forever and believing themselves entitled to it, to boot. A police officer who decides not to ticket you for speeding is acting as either or both the legislative and the judicial branch, which they are not and should never be.
These are simply two sides of the same coin: the cop who lets you go because they've decided that they make the laws or interpret them, and the cop who kills a suspect because they're criminals after all and need to be deal with harshly. Again, the only difference is that one of those benefits you, so you like it. Police officers' powers have gone unchecked in the past, and it has resulted in massive power grabs by them. We've all known someone at some point whose uncle or father or brother or best friend is a cop and who "fixed" tickets for them. Police brutality is, as we can see, a normal daily occurrence. These are closely related phenomena.
Police officers serve a hugely important role in our society, and are already given enormous power in exchange for dangers they face. Instead of the society providing close oversight proportional to the scale of that power, we have been doing the opposite for decades. We've allowed them to oversee themselves and to grab even more power. When was the last time you've heard of a police officer facing any sort of discipline for letting someone who sped go without a ticket, for whatever reason? Why are we shocked when these same officers then believe they can also do whatever they want to a suspect?