You going to attack the editorial or me? You prove the point of the editorial.
Lolol the answer is that it's an opinion piece?! That's not an answer that's an observation lol.The video with a request for response came before the Atlantic article was posted.
Also it was already answered. It's an opinion piece, not actual journalism. @Gameface answered you very well.
So are you ready to stop deflecting yet?
"Manufacturing a crisis"- an anonymous source said something while 25 witnesses dispute this.You forgot to add the mic drop.
It's actually present but going to get worse and by Harris's own words "will not stop".Protest the future!!!1!1!
You're such a dishonest Trumpist hack. She was talking about protesting for human rights, not riots. But Trumpist trash gonna do Trumpist trash.It's actually present but going to get worse and by Harris's own words "will not stop".
You're really just making s*** up now.Everything Democrats are doing.
Anonymous sources saying Trump said something
Designate enemies- police
Pride- dedicated months of pride
Voting- mail in voting. Claiming it will take week even months for results
Aim for power- who's rioting to get their way.
Right. Fighting voter suppression is hostility towards voting. Trying to get MORE people to vote is anti vote. Like buying a pint of Ben & Jerry's is anti-dairy.express hostility to voting- who's yelling at who for voter suppression? Who want mail in voting in which has been proven to lead to corruption?
That was a misquoted segment from Harris’s discussion. The rebuke on this is already long... but totally not surprised to see that you’ve been blinded. Soft boi.It's actually present but going to get worse and by Harris's own words "will not stop".
Remember when you tattled to the mods? Then you call others soft. You literally tattled because I hurt your feelings. Not much softer than a nark imo.That was a misquoted segment from Harris’s discussion. The rebuke on this is already long... but totally not surprised to see that you’ve been blinded. Soft boi.
Can you site a study about voting supression? Here I don't like anonymous sources like you guys feed off of and your entire political spectrum is based off of but since that's all Democrats know I'll use it.Right. Fighting voter suppression is hostility towards voting. Trying to get MORE people to vote is anti vote. Like buying a pint of Ben & Jerry's is anti-dairy.
Also, since you say mail-in voting has been "proven to lead to corruption," I'm sure you can cite a study?
That’s not what happened. Another instance of you misrepresenting the historical record.Remember when you tattled to the mods? Then you call others soft. You literally tattled because I hurt your feelings. Not much softer than a nark imo.
Should I tattle? LolLmao. ****ing clueless
Lol. Such a soft boi.Should I tattle? Lol
No. There's nothing you guys can say or do that would bring me to such cowardly level to go tell mom and dad like you. Like your words really matter that much to hurt me.
Lol. Such a soft boi.
Lololol who's soft?It isn’t tattling. It’s helping them spray cottonseed oil at a ****roach. I’ve been posting here for 10 years... and I’m pretty ****ing tired of the way you’re wrecking stuff.
Trumpists have no shame. Or, for that matter, critical thinking skills, empathy, the ability to self-reflect, or learn from their mistakes (because they don’t make any). They wear their ignorance as a badge of honor and expect everyone else to salute it.Lmao. ****ing clueless
Now this is just brilliant and critical thinking with empathy. Lol. Idiot comparing border protection to Nazi Germany, that is not critical thinking. That's shameful and downright stupid.Trumpists have no shame. Or, for that matter, critical thinking skills, empathy, the ability to self-reflect, or learn from their mistakes (because they don’t make any). They wear their ignorance as a badge of honor and expect everyone else to salute it.